HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bletsos, E. A. Articles by Goulas, C. K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bletsos, E. A. Articles by Goulas, C. K. Agricola Articles by Bletsos, E. A. Articles by Goulas, C. K.

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Mass Selection for Improvement of Grain Yield and Protein in a Maize Population

^a National Agricultural Research Foundation (N.AG.R.E.F.), Cereal Institute of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 312, 570 01 Thermi, Thessaloniki Greece
^b Univ. of Thessaly, School of Production Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Crop and Animal Production, Pedion Areos, 38334 Volos, Greece

chgoulas{at}uth.gr

Increasing grain protein concentration in maize (Zea mays L.) has not been a major focus of most breeding programs, which mainly focus on yield, maturity, and resistance to stress. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of three cycles of mass selection to improve simultaneously yield and grain protein in the maize population GR-OP-319, derived from the F₂ generation of the single-cross hybrid PX-95. The two-step selection procedure involved a stratified mass selection system that included check plants for environmental control. In the first step, plants having grain yield higher than 80% of the check-plant mean and protein concentration greater than the check-plant mean were selected. In the second step, the four plants within each selection grid having the highest protein concentration were selected, which resulted in a final selection intensity of 5%. Three cycles of selection were completed during 1991 to 1995. Response to selection was evaluated during the selection process and by direct field evaluation of the C₀, C₁, C₂, and C₃ populations in 1995 and 1996. The average response during the selection was 5.1% cycle^-1 for yield, 0.8 g kg^-1 cycle^-1 for protein concentration, and 7.0% cycle^-1 for protein yield. No measurable differences among cycles were observed in the direct field evaluation even though the trends in the means of the cycles followed the trends shown during selection. After three cycles, the mass selection system studied did not appear to be particularly effective.

Abbreviations: _p, population mean • _s, mean of selected plants • S, selection differential • h²_r, realized heritability • R, response to selection

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. J. Kutka and M. E. Smith How Many Parents Give the Highest Yield in Predicted Synthetic and Composite Populations of Maize? Crop Sci., September 1, 2007; 47(5): 1905 - 1913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Feil, S. B. Moser, S. Jampatong, and P. Stamp Mineral Composition of the Grains of Tropical Maize Varieties as Affected by Pre-Anthesis Drought and Rate of Nitrogen Fertilization Crop Sci., January 31, 2005; 45(2): 516 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]