|
|
||||||||
a Dep. Genetica, ESALQ-Univ. Sao Paulo, Cx.P. 83, 13.400-970, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
b Biometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Lisboa 27, Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico, D.F., Mexico
jcrossa{at}cimmyt.mx
When collecting and regenerating genetic resources, genetic drift affects the representation of a population and occurs at two stages: when sampling the parents and when gametes are sampled from these parents. The variance effective population size [Ne(v)] quantifies genetic drift. In this study, a model for calculating Ne(v), that considers the two-stage sampling of mixed self and random mating species, is developed. For germplasm collection, as the rate of natural or artificial self-fertilization (s) increases, Ne(v) is reduced and becomes increasingly dependent on the number of seed parents (P) and is less influenced by the number of seeds sampled per parent (n/P). Female gametic control (GC) leads to higher Ne(v) than with random sampling of seeds (RS), but its effect is tangible only when n/P is small. For accession regeneration, maintaining accession integrity (the proportion of functional parents, u) at an adequately high level and adopting GC are required for assuring Ne(v) equal to or greater than the actual size of the accession (Ne(v)
n). The importance of these two factors is enhanced as s increases. For arbitrary rates of selfing (0
s
1), under inbreeding equilibrium (IE) and with constant population size (n = N), Ne(v) can be adequately maintained through GC with a loss of
20% within accessions. For large sample size (n
), an accession loss of
33% can be recovered. For maintaining adequate Ne(v), artificial selfing followed by GC is more efficient than accession regeneration by natural reproduction. For achieving appropriate Ne(v)s, increasing the rate of self-fertilization in polymorphic materials makes collection more difficult but regeneration easier for minimal loss (
20%) within accessions.
Abbreviations: GC, female gametic control RS, random sampling IE, inbreeding equilibrium UI, unrestricted inbreeding
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Wang, J. Crossa, M. van Ginkel, and S. Taba Statistical Genetics and Simulation Models in Genetic Resource Conservation and Regeneration Crop Sci., November 1, 2004; 44(6): 2246 - 2253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Vencovsky and J. Crossa Measurements of Representativeness Used in Genetic Resources Conservation and Plant Breeding Crop Sci., November 1, 2003; 43(6): 1912 - 1921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Johnson, V. L. Bradley, and M. A. Evans Effective Population Size during Grass Germplasm Seed Regeneration Crop Sci., January 1, 2002; 42(1): 286 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Journal of Environmental Quality |
||||