Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 38:1159-1163 (1998)
© 1998 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butrón, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ordás, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Butrón, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ordás, R. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Butrón, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ordás, R. A.

Defense Mechanisms of Maize against Pink Stem Borer

A. Butrón*, R. A. Malvar, P. Revilla and R. A. Ordás

Misión Biológica de Galicia, CSIS, Apartado 28, 36080 Pontevedra, Spain

* Corresponding author (csgpormp{at}cesga.es).

The pink stem borer (Sesamia nonagrioides Lef.) is the most important pest of maize (Zea mays L.) in northwestern Spain. The objective of this work was to evaluate defense mechanisms against Sesamia in 10 inbred lines and the 10-parent diallel among these inbreds. Hybrids and inbred lines were tested over 2 yr in northwesternSpain under natural and artificial infestations. Yield of infested and non infested plants per plot were computed to calculate yield loss caused by the pink stem borer attack. Principal component analyses for stem damage traits and for ear damage traits were made for each infestation condition. From the principal component analysis, an index was computed to measure stem damage and ear damage. Damage index under artificial infestation was used to evaluate antibiosis while antixenosis was detected when damage index of each genotype was compared under artificial and natural infestation. The regressions of yield loss on the damage index were used to separate the genotypes into four groups according to the possession of antibiosis and/or tolerance mechanisms. A509, A661, EP31, F7, PB60, and Z77016 showed stem antibiosis. A637, A661, EP31, F7, and PB60 exhibited stem tolerance. A509, A661, and EP31 stood out by their ear antibiosis. A637, A661, F7, and PB60 were tolerant to ear damage. We conclude that the three mechanisms of defense to the pink stem borer attack (antixenosis, antibiosis, and tolerance) were found among inbred lines and hybrids. A multitrait selection scheme using damage traits and yield could improve the defense level against pink stem borer.


Research supported by Dep. of Education of the Autonomous Government of Galicia (project XUGA40301B95

Received for publication November 3, 1997.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
G. Sandoya, A. Butron, A. Alvarez, A. Ordas, and R. A. Malvar
Direct Response of a Maize Synthetic to Recurrent Selection for Resistance to Stem Borers
Crop Sci., January 16, 2008; 48(1): 113 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. Butron, P. Velasco, A. Ordas, and R. A. Malvar
Yield Evaluation of Maize Cultivars across Environments with Different Levels of Pink Stem Borer Infestation
Crop Sci., May 1, 2004; 44(3): 741 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1998 by the Crop Science Society of America.