Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 38:1149-1158 (1998)
© 1998 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weyhrich, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hallauer, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weyhrich, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hallauer, A. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Weyhrich, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hallauer, A. R.

Effective Population Size and Response to S1-Progeny Selection in the BS11 Maize Population

Roger A. Weyhrich, Kendall R. Lamkey* and Arnel R. Hallauer

Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
USDA-ARS, Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011

* Corresponding author (krlamkey{at}iastate.edu).

The number of lines recombined in a recurrent selection program affects the genetic variation remaining after selection as well as the selection intensity. Both of these variables are important in establishing and maintaining a desirable rate of progress from recurrent selection. Little empirical evidence is available in maize (Zea mays L.) to establish the appropriate effective population size for recurrent selection programs. The objective of this study was to compare the response to Si-progeny selection in four selection programs (5-S1, 10-S1, 20-S1, and 30-S1). Each program had different numbers of individuals intermated (5,10, 20, or 30, respectively) with a common selection intensity of 20%. Four cycles of selection were completed for the 5-S1, 10-S1, and 30-S1 programs and five cycles of selection were completed for the 20-S1 program. Grain yield increased significantly for the 10-S1, 20-S1. and 30-S1 programs, and there were no significant differences in rates of response among programs. Grain yield decreased signficantly in the 5-S1 program. All four programs improved significantly for grain yield of testcrosses with ‘Pioneer Two-ear Composite’, Cycle 0 (BS11CO) and the inbred B79. These results suggest that drift becomes a stronger force in altering allele frequencies than selection when fewer than 10 lines are recombined. There does not seem to be an advantage, at least in the short term, of recombining more than 10 lines per cycle of selection.


Joint contribution from the Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ. and Journal Paper no. J-17628 of the Iowa Agric. and Home Economics Exp. Stn. Project no. 3495. Part of a dissertation submitted by R.A. Weyhrich in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree

Received for publication October 13, 1997.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. Bernardo, L. Moreau, and A. Charcosset
Number and Fitness of Selected Individuals in Marker-Assisted and Phenotypic Recurrent Selection
Crop Sci., July 25, 2006; 46(5): 1972 - 1980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M.I. Vales, R.A. Malvar, P. Revilla, and A. Ordas
Recurrent Selection for Grain Yield in Two Spanish Maize Synthetic Populations
Crop Sci., January 1, 2001; 41(1): 15 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P. S. Guzman and K. R. Lamkey
Effective Population Size and Genetic Variability in the BS11 Maize Population
Crop Sci., March 1, 2000; 40(2): 338 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1998 by the Crop Science Society of America.