Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 38:1035-1041 (1998)
© 1998 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voigt, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Voigt, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, W. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Voigt, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, W. C.

Selecting Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivars

T. B. Voigt*, T. W. Fermanian and W. C. Sullivan

Dep. of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801

* Corresponding author (voigt{at}kbml.hort.uiuc.edu).

A computer-aided learning process has been previously developed to identify unique turfgrass cultivar performance levels under specific growing conditions. However, it was not determined if this process was similar to the routine assessments made by turfgrass experts. A survey was sent to 191 turfgrass experts to determine turf cultivar recommendation consistency, to validate a set of computer developed rules of association, and to determine the environmental and management characteristics the experts considered most influential on turfgrass cultivar performance. Seventy completed surveys, mostly from respondents who had worked professionally for at least 10 yr at Land Grant universities, were returned. In the first section of the survey, experts showed a high degree of consistency in recommending Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) cultivars for specific settings. In the second section of the survey, there was inconsistent agreement among survey respondents and machine learning output when presented with rules associating cultivar performance and turf settings. Finally, when asked to indicate which environment or management parameters experts felt most influence performance of specific Kentucky bluegrass cultivars, survey respondents selected mowing height, nitrogen fertilization levels, and irrigation. The computer-aided learning process also identified mowing height and nitrogen fertilization levels as influencing cultivar performance. The machine learning process also selected soil pH and average monthly air temperature as influential. Thus, there was not overall agreement between survey respondents and machine learning output.


Contribution from the Illinois Agric. Exp. Stn. This study was partially supported by the Illinois Turfgrass Foundation.

Received for publication May 15, 1997.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1998 by the Crop Science Society of America.