Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 38:643-648 (1998)
© 1998 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heitholt, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heitholt, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, W. R., Jr.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heitholt, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, W. R.

Yield, Flowering, and Leaf Area Index of Okra-Leaf and Normal-Leaf Cotton Isolines

J. J. Heitholt* and W. R. Meredith, Jr.

USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 345, Stoneville, MS 38776-0345

* Corresponding author (jheithol{at}ag.gov).

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) with alternative leaf morphologies, such as the cleft-shaped okra-leaf types, offers production advantages such as earlier maturity. However, okra-leaf types have not been commercially viable in the USA. The objectives of this study were to test okra-leaf types in genetic backgrounds varying in maturity and region of adaptation and to provide growth data that might explain yield differences. Four to seven pairs of selected cotton okra- and normal-leaf isolines (and check cultivars) were grown in the field in one 2-yr (Exp. A) and two 1-yr experiments (Exp. B and C) from 1994 to 1996 near Stoneville, MS, in row spacings of 76 and 102 cm. In Exp. A, average lint yields of okra-leaf isolines were greater overall than normal-leaf lines (847 vs. 749 kg ha–1), but in Exp. C, the opposite was true (1020 kg ha–1 for okra- vs. 1130 kg ha–1 for normal-leaf types). No yield difference was found between leaf types in Exp. B. Yields of okra-leaf lines were either equal to or less than those of recently released high-yielding commercial types whose okra-leaf isolines are not yet available. Okra-leaf types were usually 1 to 4 d earlier in maturity than their normal-leaf counterparts, possibly contributing to their overall yield advantage in Exp. A. When only okra-leaf isolines were considered, Tamcot HQ95 ranked first or second highest for yield and was the earliest to mature in all three tests. In general, the row-spacing effect and interactions with row spacing were not significant. The results indicate that the okra-leaf trait should be considered for producing future cultivars.


Names are necessary to report factually on available data; however, the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the product or service, and the use of the name by USDA implies no approval of the product or service to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable.

Received for publication July 14, 1997.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. Ulloa
Heritability and Correlations of Agronomic and Fiber Traits in an Okra-Leaf Upland Cotton Population
Crop Sci., May 18, 2006; 46(4): 1508 - 1514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1998 by the Crop Science Society of America.