Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 38:44-49 (1998)
© 1998 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Upadhyaya, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nigam, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Upadhyaya, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nigam, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Upadhyaya, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nigam, S.

Epistasis for Vegetative and Reproductive Traits in Peanut

Hari D. Upadhyaya* and Shyam Nigam

Genetic Enhancement Division, ICRISAT Asia Center, Patancheru, 502 324, Adhara Pradesh, India

* Corresponding author (H.UPADHYAYA{at}CGNET.COM).

Most genetic models assume absence of epistasis while estimating components of genetic variation. However, epistasis when present introduces bias. These biased estimates affect the progress in a breeding program since they influence the choice of breeding methodology. The objectives of this study were to determine the significance of epistasis in the inheritance of pod yield and related traits in 15 peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultigens, and to estimate the additive and dominance variances for the traits not influenced by epistasis. Two cultigens and their F1 hybrid were each crossed to 15 cultigens from 13 countries, representing three botanical groups. The experiment was conducted in the 1992-1993 post-rainy and 1993 rainy environments at the ICRISAT Asia Center, Patancheru, India. The deviations were analyzed to detect epistasis of 11 traits. Epistasis affected the expression of eight traits in both environments. Environments interacted more strongly with epistatic gene actions than with additive or dominance gene actions. Expression of epistasis was influenced by genotypes and environments, indicating the need for more genotypes and environments for effective detection of epistasis. Evidence for additive genetic variance and lower levels of partial dominance for canopy breadth and additive and dominance variances and complete dominance for shelling outturn was obtained in the post-rainy environment.


ICRISAT J.A. no. 1981.

Received for publication October 24, 1996.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. Zhang, S.-F. Hwang, B. D. Gossen, K.-F. Chang, and G. D. Turnbull
A Quantitative Analysis of Resistance to Mycosphaerella Blight in Field Pea
Crop Sci., January 22, 2007; 47(1): 162 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1998 by the Crop Science Society of America.