Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 38:254-259 (1998)
© 1998 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, S.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Shoemaker, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lin, S.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Shoemaker, R. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lin, S.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Shoemaker, R. C.

Field and Nutrient Solution Tests Measure Similar Mechanisms Controlling Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Soybean

Shun-Fu Lin, James S. Baumer, Drew Ivers, Silvia Rodriguez de Cianzo and Randy C. Shoemaker*

Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
Land O'Lakes, Inc., Webster, IA 50595
USDA-ARS, Corn Insect and Crop Genetics Unit, Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ.

* Corresponding author (rcsshoe{at}iastate.edu).

Nutrient solution systems have been considered an alternative method to field evaluations for studies of iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) and for breeding soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] with improved iron efficiency. Although rates of gain are similar for both methods, it has not been previously demonstrated that field tests and nutrient solution tests for IDC measure similar genetic mechanisms. To test this, quantitative trait loci (QTL) identified in nutrient solutions were compared with those previously identified in field studies. F2:4 lines from two populations, Pride B216 x A15 and Anoka x A7, were grown in nutrient solution and evaluated for IDC by visual scores and determinations of chlorophyll concentrations. In the Anoka x A7 population, one major gene on linkage group N, and modifying QTL on linkage groups A1 and I, that were previously mapped during field tests, also were identified in the nutrient solution test. In the Pride B216 x A15 population, one QTL previously mapped on Linkage Group I during field tests was not identified in the nutrient solution test, and a newly identified QTL was mapped on Linkage Group BI. QTL on Linkage Groups B2, G, and N were identified in both field and nutrient solution tests. We concluded that similar QTL are identified in nutrient solution and field tests and, therefore, both systems identify similar genetic mechanisms of iron uptake and/or utilization.


Contribution of the North Central Region, USDA-ARS, projects No. 3236 and 3107 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economic Exp. Stn, Ames, IA 50011. Journal paper No. J-17337.

Received for publication April 30, 1997.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. W. Franzen, J. H. O'Barr, and R. K. Zollinger
Influence of Certain Postemergence Broadleaf Herbicides on Soybean Stressed from Iron Deficiency Chlorosis
Agron. J., September 1, 2004; 96(5): 1357 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1998 by the Crop Science Society of America.