Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 37:1795-1801 (1997)
© 1997 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aslam, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rains, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Aslam, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rains, D. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Aslam, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rains, D. W.

Nitrate Uptake, Efflux, and In Vivo Reduction by Pima and Acala Cotton Cultivars

M. Aslam, K. Nielson, R. L. Travis* and D. W. Rains

Dep. of Agronomy and Range Science, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 55616-8515

* Corresponding author (rltravis{at}ucdavis.edu).

Nutrient assimilation by seedlings is an early indicator of subsequent plant growth and development. This study was conducted to compare NO3 assimilation (net uptake, efflux and in vivo reduction) by 8-d-old seedlings of three Pima (S-7, Oro Bianco, Conquistador) (Gossypium barbadense L.) and four Acala (Maxxa, GC-510, Royal, SJ-2) (Gossypium hirstum L.) cotton cultivars. The seedlings were grown hydroponically in a growth chamber and induced with 0.05, 0.1, or 1.0 mM NO3 for 24 h. Net NO3 uptake rates were determined by following its depletion from uptake solutions that initially contained the same concentration of NO3 as the induction solutions. Efflux was measured by following NO3 accumulation in an external solution. At 0.05 mM NO3, net uptake rates for the Acala cultivars were about 40% lower than those for Pima cultivars. These differences disappeared as the NO3 concentration in the growth mediumw as increased to 1.0 mM. In contrast, efflux from Acala roots was 40 to 50% lower than that from Pima roots at all NO3 levels. Although NO3 concentration of roots increased about three fold as the NO3 level in the induction mediumin creased, efflux increased only 20 to 30%. In vivo NO3 reduction by Pima and Acala cultivars was similar when the seedlings were supplied with 1.0 mM NO3. However, at 0.05 mM NO3 the Pima cultivars reduced NO3 more effectively than did the Acala cultivars. The results indicate that Pima cultivars are better able to utilize available NO3 at lower concentrations even though they efflux greater amounts of NO3.


This research was supported in part by grants from the California Crop Improvement Association and Cotton Incorporated.

Received for publication August 6, 1996.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Santi, G. Locci, R. Monte, R. Pinton, and Z. Varanini
Induction of nitrate uptake in maize roots: expression of a putative high-affinity nitrate transporter and plasma membrane H+-ATPase isoforms
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2003; 54(389): 1851 - 1864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. Aslam, R. L. Travis, and D. W. Rains
Inhibition of Net Nitrate Uptake by Ammonium in Pima and Acala Cotton Roots
Crop Sci., July 1, 2001; 41(4): 1130 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. Aslam, R.L. Travis, and D.W. Rains
Diurnal Fluctuations of Nitrate Uptake and In Vivo Nitrate Reductase Activity in Pima and Acala Cotton
Crop Sci., March 1, 2001; 41(2): 372 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the Crop Science Society of America.