Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 37:879-884 (1997)
© 1997 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Board, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Harville, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Board, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Harville, B. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Board, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Harville, B. G.

Path Analyses Identify Indirect Selection Criteria for Yield of Late-Planted Soybean

J. E. Board*, M. S. Kang and B. G. Harville

Dep. of Agronomy, Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Ctr., Baton Rouge, LA 70803-2110

* Corresponding author (E-mail: jboard{at}agctr.lsu.edu).

Research aimed at increasing yields of late-planted soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in the southeastern USA would be facilitated by identification of yield components that indicate plot yield (combine-harvested yield). Such yield components could be used as criteria in environmental and genetic research where plot yield cannot be obtained. Thus, our objective was to apply path analysis to previous studies to evaluate yield components for potential use as selection criteria (yield indicators) for future late-planted studies. Path analysis was applied to plot yield (response variable) and various yield components (predictor variables) for five late-planted studies conducted across 1987 to 1993 near Baton Rouge, LA (30°N Lat). Studies were grouped into four data sets based on treatment factors: row spacing-plant population; row spacing; partial defoliation treatments during the reproductive period; and row spacing-cultivar. All studies involving row spacing, plant population, and partial defoliation showed that seed number was the best indirect selection criterion for predicting plot yield. However, in a study involving 12 cultivars, genotypic path analysis indicated pod per reproductive node as the best indirect selection criterion. Because of the greater inferential base of this study and the positive influence of pod per reproductive node at both phenotypic (path coefficient = 1.61) and genotypic levels (path coefficient = 4.31), greater attention should be given to this yield component for genetic improvement of soybean at late plantings.


Approved for publication by the Director of the Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn. as manuscript no. 96-09-0150.

Received for publication May 17, 1996.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the Crop Science Society of America.