Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 37:406-415 (1997)
© 1997 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crossa, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cornelius, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Crossa, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cornelius, P. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Crossa, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cornelius, P. L.

Sites Regression and Shifted Multiplicative Model Clustering of Cultivar Trial Sites under Heterogeneity of Error Variances

José Crossa* and Paul L. Cornelius

Biometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Lisboa 27, Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 México D.F., México
Dep. of Agronomy and Dep. of Statistics, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091

* Corresponding author (jcrossa{at}alphac.cimmyt.mx).

Previous papers have developed the shifted multiplicative model with one multiplieative term (SHMM1) as a model for clustering yield trial sites or cultivars into groups in which cultivar rank changes are statistically negligible. Properties of SHMM1 are proportionality of predicted cultivar differences within sites, and of site differences within cultivars. The latter constraint is relaxed if the sites regression model with one multiplicative term (SREG1) is used instead of SHMM1. Dendrograms for the two methods are identical, but SHMM and SREG analyses of clusters suggested by the dendrogram may lead to different conclusions concerning acceptability of a particular cluster. This study compared SREG clustering to SHMM clustering in two international maize (Zea mays L.) cultivar trials, when the data to which models were fitted were original unscaled cell means, and, as a way to cope with site to site heterogeneity of error variance, cell means scaled by dividing by the standard error of a cultivar mean within the particular site. Results of both trials confirmed our expectation that SREG clustering would occasionally allow clusters to merge which would not be statistically acceptable under SHMM analysis. This occurred at a cost of a modest increase in percentage and magnitude of significant crossover interactions within the clusters. Both trials exhibited significant site to site heterogeneity of error variances. Scaling of data resulted in more effective removal of significant rank-change interactions from within clusters, provided that the test criterion was based on the assumption of heterogeneous variance. Besides occasionally allowing larger clusters, advantages for SREG clustering of sites are (i) all solutions (including constrained non-crossover solutions) exist in closed form and (ii) the analysis of scaled data is equivalent to a weighted least squares analysis, neither of which holds for SHMM.


The investigation reported in this paper (No. 96-06-032) is in connection with a project of the Kentucky Agric. Exp. Stn and is published with approval of the Director.

Received for publication March 6, 1996.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Burgueno, J. Crossa, P. L. Cornelius, and R.-C. Yang
Using Factor Analytic Models for Joining Environments and Genotypes without Crossover Genotype x Environment Interaction
Crop Sci., July 1, 2008; 48(4): 1291 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Rane, R. K. Pannu, V. S. Sohu, R. S. Saini, B. Mishra, J. Shoran, J. Crossa, M. Vargas, and A. K. Joshi
Performance of Yield and Stability of Advanced Wheat Genotypes under Heat Stress Environments of the Indo-Gangetic Plains
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1561 - 1573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. K. Joshi, G. Ortiz-Ferrara, J. Crossa, G. Singh, G. Alvarado, M. R. Bhatta, E. Duveiller, R. C. Sharma, D. B. Pandit, A. B. Siddique, et al.
Associations of Environments in South Asia Based on Spot Blotch Disease of Wheat Caused by Cochliobolus sativus
Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 1071 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Crossa, J. Burgueno, P. L. Cornelius, G. McLaren, R. Trethowan, and A. Krishnamachari
Modeling Genotype x Environment Interaction Using Additive Genetic Covariances of Relatives for Predicting Breeding Values of Wheat Genotypes
Crop Sci., June 20, 2006; 46(4): 1722 - 1733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. Lillemo, M. van Ginkel, R. M. Trethowan, E. Hernandez, and J. Crossa
Differential Adaptation of CIMMYT Bread Wheat to Global High Temperature Environments
Crop Sci., October 27, 2005; 45(6): 2443 - 2453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. A. Malvar, P. Revilla, A. Butron, B. Gouesnard, A. Boyat, P. Soengas, A. Alvarez, and A. Ordas
Performance of Crosses among French and Spanish Maize Populations across Environments
Crop Sci., May 6, 2005; 45(3): 1052 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R.-C. Yang, S. F. Blade, J. Crossa, D. Stanton, and M. S. Bandara
Identifying Isoyield Environments for Field Pea Production
Crop Sci., January 1, 2005; 45(1): 106 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. Butron, P. Velasco, A. Ordas, and R. A. Malvar
Yield Evaluation of Maize Cultivars across Environments with Different Levels of Pink Stem Borer Infestation
Crop Sci., May 1, 2004; 44(3): 741 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. M. Trethowan, M. van Ginkel, K. Ammar, J. Crossa, T. S. Payne, B. Cukadar, S. Rajaram, and E. Hernandez
Associations among Twenty Years of International Bread Wheat Yield Evaluation Environments
Crop Sci., September 1, 2003; 43(5): 1698 - 1711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Franco, J. Crossa, S. Taba, and H. Shands
A Multivariate Method for Classifying Cultivars and Studying Group x Environment x Trait Interaction
Crop Sci., July 1, 2003; 43(4): 1249 - 1258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
W. K. Russell, K. M. Eskridge, D. A. Travnicek, and F. R. Guillen-Portal
Clustering Environments to Minimize Change in Rank of Cultivars
Crop Sci., May 1, 2003; 43(3): 858 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Crossa, P. L. Cornelius, and W. Yan
Biplots of Linear-Bilinear Models for Studying Crossover Genotype x Environment Interaction
Crop Sci., March 1, 2002; 42(2): 619 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. M. Trethowan, J. Crossa, M. van Ginkel, and S. Rajaram
Relationships among Bread Wheat International Yield Testing Locations in Dry Areas
Crop Sci., September 1, 2001; 41(5): 1461 - 1469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
W. T. Federer, M. Reynolds, and J. Crossa
Combining Results from Augmented Designs over Sites
Agron. J., March 1, 2001; 93(2): 389 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the Crop Science Society of America.