Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 37:97-102 (1997)
© 1997 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matus, A.
Right arrow Articles by van Kessel, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Matus, A.
Right arrow Articles by van Kessel, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Matus, A.
Right arrow Articles by van Kessel, C.

Genotype x Environment Interaction for Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Spring Wheat

Alejandro Matus*, Alfred E. Slinkard and Chris van Kessel

Dep. of Soil Science
Crop Development Centre
Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

* Corresponding author (matus{at}usask.sask.ca).

Carbon isotope discrimination (CID) has been proposed as a parameter to indirectly select for improved transpiration efficiency (W) and grain yield in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Little information exists on the genotype x environment (G x E) interaction for CID in spring wheat. Therefore, to determine the magnitude of the G x E interaction for CID eight spring wheat genotypes were grown at five locations in both 1992 and 1993 in Saskatchewan, Canada. In addition, we measured genetic variability for CID and the magnitude of the phenotypic correlation between grain yield and CID. Samples were collected for CID determination from leaves at flowering, mature leaves, and mature kernels. The genotype x location (G x L) interaction for CID traits was non-significant. The significant genotype x year (G x Y) interaction for CID of mature leaves was a crossover type interaction, due to the genotype ‘Lakhish’. The crossover genotype x location x year (G x L x Y) interaction for grain yield and the significant G x L x Y interaction for CID of leaves at flowering was at least partially due to the erratic response of the genotypes ‘Genesis’, ‘Oslo’, ‘AC Minto’, and Lakhish. Genotypic differences for CID of leaves at flowering and CID of mature leaves were not significant. However, wheat genotypes differed in CID of kernels. The phenotypic correlations between grain yield and the three CID traits were not significant. These results suggest that among our selected sample of eight genotypes CID of leaves at flowering, CID of mature leaves, and CID of kernels could not be used to indirectly select for grain yield.

Received for publication December 11, 1995.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the Crop Science Society of America.