Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 36:1092-1098 (1996)
© 1996 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Coors, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Coors, J. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Coors, J. G.

Teosinte Cytoplasmic Genomes: II. Performance of Maize Hybrids with Teosinte Cytoplasms

Jode W. Edwards* and James G. Coors

Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
Dep. of Agronomy, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706

* Corresponding author (Jode{at}iastate.edu).

Alien cytoplasm substitution effects on quantitative agronomic characters in maize breeding germplasm have been studied many times, but few cytoplasmic effects have been found. This research was conducted to evaluate the importance of nuclear sources of variation often confounded with cytoplasmic effects, and to study effects of substituting teosinte cytoplasms into Zea mays ssp. mays hybrids. Cytolines were developed by transferring 11 cytoplasms to maize inbreds A619 and W23 by at least six generations of backcrossing. Reciprocal testcrosses were made between cytolines and three testers as well as between A619 and W23 and the same testers. Nuclear effects on reciprocal cross differences and effects of incomplete recovery of cytoline nuclear genotypes were large enough to cause bias in estimates of cytoplasmic effects, had appropriate comparisons not been available to account for these sources of variation. The 11 teosinte cytoplasms reduced grain yield by an average of 0.20 Mg ha–1 or 2.2%. Cytoplasmic effects averaged across all cytoplasms and hybrids were not significantly different from zero for any other trait. One of 11 cytoplasms studied had stable effects on hybrid performance. Four additional cytoplasms had appreciable effects that varied widely with the nuclear genotype. Direct substitution of any of these cytoplasms into maize hybrids would not likely be of great benefit because desirable effects were generally small and difficult to predict in different nuclear-cytoplasmic combinations.


Part of a thesis submitted by J.W. Edwards in partial fulfillment of requirements for the M.S. degree at the Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.

Received for publication May 3, 1995.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1996 by the Crop Science Society of America.