Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 36:872-876 (1996)
© 1996 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernardo, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bernardo, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bernardo, R.

Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of the Performance of Crosses between Untested Maize Inbreds

Rex Bernardo*

Limagrain Genetics, 4805 W. Old Church Rd., Champaign, IL 61821

* Corresponding author (bernardo{at}prairienet.org).

In some situations, maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds may not have testcross data available for best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) single-cross performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of BLUP when the parents of a single cross have not been tested in hybrid combination within a given heterotic pattern. Yield, moisture, stalk lodging, and root lodging data were obtained for 4099 single crosses evaluated by Limagrain Genetics in multilocation trials in 1990 to 1994. For each of 16 heterotic patterns, the performance of an i x j single cross was predicted as follows: (i) with all available testcross data for both i and j and their relatives; (ii) disregarding all testcross data for i; (iii) disregarding all testcross data for j; and (iv) disregarding all testcross data for both i and j. Correlations between predicted and observed performance, obtained with a cross-validation procedure, were highest when testcross data for both parents of a single cross were utilized. Except for moisture, these correlations were severely reduced to <0.50 when both i and j were assumed untested. Prediction of performance of the cross between two untested inbreds seems unwarranted, but this situation is rare because new inbreds are usually crossed to extensively tested inbreds. The performance of the cross between an untested inbred and a tested inbred was predicted effectively when the number of tested single crosses in the heterotic pattern was large. In this situation, the highest correlations were {nsubset} 90% of the corresponding correlations obtained when data were available for both parents of the single cross.

Received for publication July 10, 1995.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R.-C. Yang
Likelihood-Based Analysis of Genotype-Environment Interactions
Crop Sci., September 1, 2002; 42(5): 1434 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. Bernardo
Marker-Assisted Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of Single-Cross Performance
Crop Sci., September 1, 1999; 39(5): 1277 - 1282.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1996 by the Crop Science Society of America.