Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 36:341-348 (1996)
© 1996 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crasta, O. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Crasta, O. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Crasta, O. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. J.

Temperature and Soil Water Effects on Maize Growth, Development Yield, and Forage Quality

O. R. Crasta and W. J. Cox*

Dep. of Agronomy, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Dep. of Soil, Crop and Atmospheric Sciences, 141 Emerson Hall, Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853

* Corresponding author (WJC3{at}cornell.edu).

Topographical features in the northeastern USA result in different growing conditions between locations within close proximity. Dairy producers demand information on how these differences influence forage maize (Zea mays L.). Three hybrids were planted at two dates and two locations in 1990 and 1991 to evaluate the effect of growing conditions on growth, development, yield, and forage quality of maize. Dry matter (DM) yields, which averaged 16.4 Mg ha–1 at Aurora vs. 14.7 at Mt. Pleasant, NY, in 1990 and 12.7 vs 12.0 in 1991, correlated with DM accumulation at silking (r = 0.86), but not at the eighth-leaf (V8) stage (r = 0.19). Maize at Aurora, NY, which had higher average temperatures (22.4°C) during the V8 to silking interval than Mt. Pleasant (20.4°C), accumulated more DM at silking in 1990 (822 vs. 678 g m–2) and 1991 (620 vs. 545) because of higher crop growth rates (28 vs. 23 g m–2 d–1 in 1990 and 22 vs. 20 in 1991) during the same length of growth interval. Location did not affect neutral detergent fiber (NDF) or in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) in 1990, but the cool compared with warm location had higher IVDMD (765 vs. 747 g kg–1) and lower NDF (376 vs. 397 g kg–1) in 1991. The dry 1991 growing season compared with 1990 had lower NDF (386 vs. 431 kg–1) and higher 1VDMD (756 vs. 717 g kg–1). Apparently, soil water differences between locations in the northeastern USA affect maize forage quality more than temperature differences do.

Received for publication February 23, 1995.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
K. B. Jensen, B. L. Waldron, K. H. Asay, D. A. Johnson, and T. A. Monaco
Forage Nutritional Characteristics of Orchardgrass and Perennial Ryegrass at Five Irrigation Levels
Agron. J., May 1, 2003; 95(3): 668 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1996 by the Crop Science Society of America.