Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 36:318-324 (1996)
© 1996 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Li, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Li, P. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Li, P. H.

Factors Affecting a Laboratory Evaluation of Alfalfa Cold Tolerance

P. M. Schwab, D. K. Barnes, C. C. Sheaffer* and P. H. Li

Dep. Agronomy and Plant Genetics, 411 Borlaug Hall, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
USDA-ARS in the Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, St. Paul, MN 55108
Dep. of Horticultural Science, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

* Corresponding author (sheaf001{at}maroon.tc.umn.edu).

Currently, only test winter data are used to evaluate the winter hardiness of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars. A test winter is defined as field conditions severe enough to kill nonhardy cultivars and to cause varying degrees of winter injury to cultivars of intermediate hardiness. Due to the unpredictability of test winter occurrence, alternative methods are needed for predicting alfalfa winter survival. This research tested the effects of temperature stress, storage time, and plant size, measured as the width of the root at the crown-root juncture, on a laboratory cold tolerance evaluation of field grown and hardened alfalfa plants. Plants were dug from the field in mid-November and stored at –2°C until subjected to cold stresses from 0 to –24°C. Differences among entries were greatest at the –12 and –16°C cold treatments. Crown injury score was positively correlated with field fall growth (r = 0.91) and winter injury scores (r = 0.95; P ≤ 0.01). Root injury score was correlated positively with field fall growth (r = 0.87) and winter injury scores (r = 0.95; P < 0.01). Large plants (>10-mm root diameter) had lower cold injury scores than small plants (1- to S-mm root diameter). Correlations between plant size and winter injury were greatest (r > –0.55, P ≤ 0.05) at low freezing temperatures. We propose a laboratory test in which field-hardened seeding-year alfalfa entries of a similar size are packed in dry vermiculite, exposed to temperatures of –12 to –16°C for 1 to 2 h, thawed, and scored after 3 wk of regrowth.


Joint contribution from the Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn. and the USDA-ARS, Paper no. 21,446 Scientific Journal Series Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn.

Received for publication December 2, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. H. Skinner and D. L. Gustine
Freezing Tolerance of Chicory and Narrow-Leaf Plantain
Crop Sci., November 1, 2002; 42(6): 2038 - 2043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1996 by the Crop Science Society of America.