Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 36:274-278 (1996)
© 1996 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siehl, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Subramanian, M. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Siehl, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Subramanian, M. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Siehl, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Subramanian, M. V.

Patterns of Cross-Tolerance to Herbicides Inhibiting Acetohydroxyacid Synthase in Commercial Corn Hybrids Designed for Tolerance to Imidazolinones

D. L. Siehl*, A. S. Bengtson, J. P. Brockman, J. H. Butler, G. W. Kraatz, R. J. Lamoreaux and M. V. Subramanian

Sandoz Agro, Inc., 975 California Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304-1104
Sandoz Agro, Inc., 5653 Monterey Rd., Gilroy, CA 95020

* Corresponding author (siehl{at}sandoz.com).

Two commercial corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids, ICI 8532 IT and Pioneer 3180 IR, designed for tolerance to imidazolinones, were evaluated for tolerance to various acetohydroxyacid synthase-inhibiting herbicides at the whole plant and enzyme levels. The purpose was to establish and compare the underlying enzymatic basis for tolerance in these plants, which were produced by contrasting methods and contain different genetic complements of the altered target enzyme. ICI IT plants exhibited significant tolerance (40-fold higher rates for 50% inhibition of growth than the control hybrid) to imazethapyr, and somewhat less to imazaquin and pyrimidyloxybenzoate. ICI IT plants were no more tolerant to chlorsulfuron or flumetsulam than the control hybrid. Pioneer IR plants were highly tolerant to all of the AHAS inhibitors tested, requiring rates 200- to 2000-fold higher than those of the control hybrid for 50% inhibition of growth. The basis for tolerance was evaluated on acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS, EC 4.1.3.18) in vitro. Relative to unmodified AHAS isolated from the control hybrid, AHAS isolated from ICI IT corn was seven-fold less sensitive to imazethapyr, five-fold less sensitive to pyrimidyloxybenzoate and two-fold less sensitive to imazaquin, but was as sensitive to chlorsulfuron and flumetsulam. AHAS from Pioneer IR corn was highly insensitive to all of the AHAS inhibitors tested. Sensitivity to the feedback inhibitor leucine was not detectably altered in the modified enzymes. Substrate saturation kinetics of AHAS isolated from ICI IT corn were identical with those of unmodified AHAS, while AHAS from Pioneer IR required a two-fold higher concentration of pyruvate for half-maximal saturation. The results support the theory that because the catalytic and herbicide binding sites of AHAS are distinct from each other, crops can be designed for tolerance to AHAS-inhibiting herbicides with little effect on performance.

Received for publication August 1, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
G. Jander, S. R. Baerson, J. A. Hudak, K. A. Gonzalez, K. J. Gruys, and R. L. Last
Ethylmethanesulfonate Saturation Mutagenesis in Arabidopsis to Determine Frequency of Herbicide Resistance
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2003; 131(1): 139 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1996 by the Crop Science Society of America.