Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 36:50-56 (1996)
© 1996 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernardo, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bernardo, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bernardo, R.

Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of Maize Single-Cross Performance

Rex Bernardo*

Limagrain Genetics, 4805 W. Old Church Rd., Champaign, IL 61821

* Corresponding author (bernardo{at}prairienet.org).

In preliminary studies, best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) has been found useful for identifying high-yielding maize (Zea mays L.) single crosses prior to field evaluation. In this study, the effectiveness of BLUP for large-scale prediction of yield, moisture, stalk lodging, and root lodging was investigated. Multilocation data from 1990 to 1994 were obtained from the hybrid testing program of Limagrain Genetics. For each of 16 heterotic patterns, the performance of m untested single crosses was predicted from the performance of n tested single crosses as YM = CMP Cpp-1 YP, where YM = m x 1 vector of predicted performance of the untested single crosses; CMP = m x n matrix of genetic covariances between the untested single crosses and the tested single crosses; Cpp = n x n phenotypic covariance matrix among the tested single crosses; and YP = n x 1 vector of average performance of the tested single crosses, corrected for yield trial effects. Correlations between predicted and observed performance were obtained with a delete-one cross-validation procedure. For heterotic patterns with large (>100) numbers of tested single crosses, the correlations ranged from 0.426 to 0.762 for yield, 0.754 to 0.933 for moisture, 0.300 to 0.739 for stalk lodging, and 0.164 to 0.532 for root lodging. The correlations, especially for lodging traits, increased as larger numbers of tested single crosses were available. The results in this study were obtained from large and diverse data sets (600 inbreds, 15 183 data points, and 4099 tested single crosses across 16 heterotic patterns) and provide strong evidence that BLUP is useful for routine identification of superior single crosses prior to field testing.

Received for publication February 12, 1995.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. Bernardo and J. Yu
Prospects for Genomewide Selection for Quantitative Traits in Maize
Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 1082 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Y.-M. Zhang, Y. Mao, C. Xie, H. Smith, L. Luo, and S. Xu
Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci Using Naturally Occurring Genetic Variance Among Commercial Inbred Lines of Maize (Zea mays L.)
Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2267 - 2275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. Bernardo
What If We Knew All the Genes for a Quantitative Trait in Hybrid Crops?
Crop Sci., January 1, 2001; 41(1): 1 - 4.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. Bernardo
Marker-Assisted Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of Single-Cross Performance
Crop Sci., September 1, 1999; 39(5): 1277 - 1282.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1996 by the Crop Science Society of America.