Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 35:1642-1646 (1995)
© 1995 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albrecht, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wysocki, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Albrecht, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wysocki, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Albrecht, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wysocki, D. J.

Effects of Foliar Methanol Applications on Crop Yield

S. L. Albrecht*, C. L. Douglas, Jr., E. L. Klepper, P. E. Rasmussen, R. W. Rickman, R. W. Smiley, D. E. Wilkins and D. J. Wysocki

USDA-ARS, Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center, Pendleton, OR 97801
Columbia Basin Agric. Research Center, Pendleton, OR 97801

* Corresponding author (a031cpendlet{at}attmail.com).

Recent reports indicate that vegetative growth and yield of C3 crops are enhanced by foliar methanol application and that overall crop water use was reduced by methanol sprays. It has been suggested that methanol may act as a C source for the plant and a photorespiration inhibitor. Field experiments were conducted near Pendleton, OR, during 1993 and 1994 to determine if foliar methanol applications would increase crop growth and yield in the dryland agroecosystems common to the Pacific Northwest. Methanol solutions (200 or 400 mL L–1 with a surfactant) were applied to winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), spring wheat, spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) at several plant growth stages. Phytotoxic symptoms were observed only with the highest concentration of methanol. No significant response, either beneficial or detrimental, to methanol application was found in any crop. No differences were found in stomatal conductance or leaf specific weight between any methanol treatment and the controls. Methanol applications did not significantly increase crop growth or yield. We concluded that methanol applications will not benefit grain and pea production in the northwestern USA.


Oregon Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal no. 10552.

Received for publication September 6, 1994.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the Crop Science Society of America.