Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 35:1359-1364 (1995)
© 1995 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffbeck, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stuthman, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hoffbeck, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stuthman, D. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hoffbeck, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stuthman, D. D.

Backcrossing and Intermating in an Exotic x Adapted Cross of Maize

M. D. Hoffbeck*, S. J. Openshaw and J. L. Geadelmann

Pioneer Hi-Bred Intl., Inc., 590 Deer Rd., Macomb, IL 61455
Pioneer Hi-Bred Intl., Inc., P.O. Box 1004, Johnston, IA 50131
Geadelmann, Holden's Foundation Seed, R.R. #1, Box 112, Stanton, MN 55018

R. H. Peterson and D. D. Stuthman

Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

* Corresponding author (hoffbeckmd{at}phibred.com).

Incorporation of exotic germplasm into the U.S. maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm pool has often been proposed. Backcrossing and intermating were studied as techniques for incorporation of exotic germplasm using the populations AS-A and MN-ETO. Three levels of backcrossing (0, 1, and 2 backcrosses) and cycles of intermating (1, 3, and 5 cycles) were examined in all combinations by extracting 100 random S1 lines from each treatment for field evaluation. All lines were evaluated for eight traits in six environments. Data for grain yield, grain harvest moisture, lodging, plant height, ear height, number of days to 50% silk emergence, number of days to 50% pollen shed, and a selection index (SI) [SI = grain yield (kg ha–1) –18.8 x harvest moisture (g kg–1)] were analyzed. Analyses on trait means, genetic variances, correlated responses, selection differentials, and frequency distributions indicated that backcrossing generally shifted means and resulted in smaller genetic variances. Phenotypic correlations were both increased and decreased depending on the comparison examined. Changes of selection differentials of secondary traits were consistent with phenotypic correlations. The effect of backcrossing on the means of selected and unselected lines was very similar. Many changes were maturity related. Intermating levels used had no detectable effect on the populations. Significant differences were found, but these were isolated and did not form trends across intermating levels or backcross treatments. The results of this study suggest that backcrossing is useful in the incorporation of exotic germplasm, but results do not support the use of repeated intermating.


Contribution from Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn., Scientific Journal Series no. 20,994.

Received for publication March 23, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. Arbelbide and R. Bernardo
Random Mating before Selfing in Maize BC1 Populations
Crop Sci., March 1, 2004; 44(2): 401 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. Simic, T. Presterl, G. Seitz, and H. H. Geiger
Comparing Methods for Integrating Exotic Germplasm into European Forage Maize Breeding Programs
Crop Sci., November 1, 2003; 43(6): 1952 - 1959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the Crop Science Society of America.