Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 35:1247-1258 (1995)
© 1995 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buhler, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Buhler, D. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Buhler, D. D.

Influence of Tillage Systems on Weed Population Dynamics and Management in Corn and Soybean in the Central USA

Douglas D. Buhler*

USDA-ARS Nat. Soil Tilth Lab., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011

* Corresponding author (buhler{at}nstl.gov).

Species composition and population densities of weed communities of arable land reflect agronomic practices. The trend toward reducing tillage in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production changes the environment where weeds are managed, survive, and reproduce. The shift from tillage systems that include extensive annual soil disturbance to systems that minimize soil disturbance will cause major changes in weed population dynamics. These changes often reduce the effectiveness of weed control practices. Reduced herbicide efficacy has slowed adoption of conservation tillage because many conservation tillage systems rely heavily on herbicides for weed management. Poor understanding of weed population dynamics and lack of suitable control alternatives often result in increased herbicide use in conservation tillage systems. While results have varied among experiments, some general trends in weed population dynamics have arisen as tillage is reduced. These include increased populations of perennial, summer annual grass, biennial, and winter annual species. Densities of large-seeded dicot species often decrease. The ecological and management aspects of these changes are varied and complex. Effective, economical, and environmentally sound weed management in conservation tillage systems will require integration of new information with established principles of weed management. New management systems and control technologies are needed to develop integrated weed management systems for the altered ecosystems created by conservation tillage production systems.


Contribution of the USDA-ARS Nat. Soil Tilth Lab., Ames, IA. This invited review was presented at the 1993 CSSA C-3 symposium "Weed/Crop Interactions in Cropping Systems."

Received for publication December 5, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. G. Smith, F. D. Menalled, and G. P. Robertson
Temporal Yield Variability under Conventional and Alternative Management Systems
Agron. J., November 6, 2007; 99(6): 1629 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
B. J. Hendrix, B. G. Young, and S.-K. Chong
Weed Management in Strip Tillage Corn
Agron. J., January 1, 2004; 96(1): 229 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
W. J. Cox, J.S. Singer, E.J. Shields, J.K. Waldron, and G. C. Bergstrom
Agronomics and Economics of Different Weed Management Systems in Corn and Soybean
Agron. J., July 1, 1999; 91(4): 585 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the Crop Science Society of America.