Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 35:846-851 (1995)
© 1995 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Board, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Board, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Q.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Board, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Q.

Assimilatory Capacity Effects on Soybean Yield Components and Pod Number

J. E. Board* and Qiang Tan

Dep. of Agron., Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., LSU Agric. Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803

* Corresponding author (xpes09{at}lsuvm.sncc.lsu.edu).

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield is more restricted by assimilatory capacity (source strength) during the reproductive (R1 to R7) compared with vegetative period (emergence to R1). Although pod number (per unit ground area) is recognized as an important factor affecting yield, the period in which this yield component is source restricted has not been clearly identified. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine this period by identifying yield components through which source strength affects pod number and finding when these yield components are determined. Field studies were conducted during 1991 and 1992 with ‘Centennial’ soybean at Baton Rouge, LA, on a Mhoon silty clay soil (fine-silty, mixed, nonacid, thermic Typic Fluvaquent). Treatments were partial defoliations designed to create light interception differences during R1 to R7. Yield was reduced 23% by defoliation. Harvest index, which was 0.59 for the control, ranged from 0.56 to 0.60 for the defoliation treatments. Source strength influenced pod number (per unit ground area) through branch dry matter, branch number, branch node number, and pods per reproductive node on the whole plant. Pods per reproductive node were regulated by pod initiation (pods at least 0.5 cm long) and/or abortion initiated pods. Determination of final pod number occurred at 10 to 12 d after R5. In conclusion, pod number was source restricted from R1 to 10 to 12 d after R5. Stresses that restrict source strength during this period should be avoided to optimize pod number and yield.


Approved for publication by the Director of the Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn. as manuscript no. 94-09-8122.

Received for publication April 13, 1993.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
S. Kumudini, C. V. Godoy, J. E. Board, J. Omielan, and M. Tollenaar
Mechanisms Involved in Soybean Rust-Induced Yield Reduction
Crop Sci., November 24, 2008; 48(6): 2334 - 2342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
N. Phakamas, A. Patanothai, S. Jogloy, K. Pannangpetch, and G. Hoogenboom
Physiological Determinants for Pod Yield of Peanut Lines
Crop Sci., November 24, 2008; 48(6): 2351 - 2360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A. G. Kantolic and G. A. Slafer
Development and Seed Number in Indeterminate Soybean as Affected by Timing and Duration of Exposure to Long Photoperiods after Flowering
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2007; 99(5): 925 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. E. Board, V. Maka, R. Price, D. Knight, and M. E. Baur
Development of Vegetation Indices for Identifying Insect Infestations in Soybean
Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 650 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. E. Board and H. Modali
Dry Matter Accumulation Predictors for Optimal Yield in Soybean
Crop Sci., August 1, 2005; 45(5): 1790 - 1799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. W. Singer, R. W. Malone, D. W. Meek, and D. Drake
PREDICTING YIELD LOSS IN INDETERMINATE SOYBEAN FROM POD DENSITY USING SIMULATED DAMAGE STUDIES
Agron. J., March 1, 2004; 96(2): 584 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P. Pedersen and J. G. Lauer
Soybean Growth and Development in Various Management Systems and Planting Dates
Crop Sci., March 1, 2004; 44(2): 508 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. E. Board
Soybean Cultivar Differences on Light Interception and Leaf Area Index during Seed Filling
Agron. J., January 1, 2004; 96(1): 305 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. E. Brevedan and D. B. Egli
Short Periods of Water Stress during Seed Filling, Leaf Senescence, and Yield of Soybean
Crop Sci., November 1, 2003; 43(6): 2083 - 2088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. E. Board, M. S. Kang, and M. L. Bodrero
Yield Components as Indirect Selection Criteria for Late-Planted Soybean Cultivars
Agron. J., March 1, 2003; 95(2): 420 - 429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
F. H. Andrade, P. Calvino, A. Cirilo, and P. Barbieri
Yield Responses to Narrow Rows Depend on Increased Radiation Interception
Agron. J., September 1, 2002; 94(5): 975 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. B. Egli and W. P. Bruening
Synchronous Flowering and Fruit Set at Phloem-Isolated Nodes in Soybean
Crop Sci., September 1, 2002; 42(5): 1535 - 1540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
C. R.C. Vega, F. H. Andrade, V. O. Sadras, S. A. Uhart, and O. R. Valentinuz
Seed Number as a Function of Growth. A Comparative Study in Soybean, Sunflower, and Maize
Crop Sci., May 1, 2001; 41(3): 748 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. R. Frederick, C. R. Camp, and P. J. Bauer
Drought-Stress Effects on Branch and Mainstem Seed Yield and Yield Components of Determinate Soybean
Crop Sci., May 1, 2001; 41(3): 759 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. A. Ball, R. W. McNew, E. D. Vories, T. C. Keisling, and L. C. Purcell
Path Analyses of Population Density Effects on Short-Season Soybean Yield
Agron. J., January 1, 2001; 93(1): 187 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. A. Ball, L. C. Purcell, and E. D. Vories
Short-Season Soybean Yield Compensation in Response to Population and Water Regime
Crop Sci., July 1, 2000; 40(4): 1070 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
W.P. Bruening and D.B. Egli
Relationship between Photosynthesis and Seed Number at Phloem Isolated Nodes in Soybean
Crop Sci., November 1, 1999; 39(6): 1769 - 1775.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D.B. Egli
Variation in Leaf Starch and Sink Limitations during Seed Filling in Soybean
Crop Sci., September 1, 1999; 39(5): 1361 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the Crop Science Society of America.