Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 35:378-382 (1995)
© 1995 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chung, Y. S.
Right arrow Articles by Griffey, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chung, Y. S.
Right arrow Articles by Griffey, C. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chung, Y. S.
Right arrow Articles by Griffey, C. A.

Powdery Mildew Resistance in Winter Wheat: I. Gene Number and Mode of Inheritance

Y. S. Chung and C. A. Griffey*

Dep. of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg 24061

* Corresponding author.

Few widely effective sources of resistance to powdery mildew, caused by Blumeria graminis (DC.) E. O. Speer f. sp. tritici Em. Marchal, have been identified in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and the identity of resistance genes in many cultivars is unknown. Ten winter wheat lines selected from the 1982 International Winter Wheat Mildew and Rust Nurseries were studied to characterize gene number and mode of inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew. Each of the lines were crossed to the susceptible cultivar Chancellor. Seedlings of the parental lines, F1, F2, BC1 (Chancellor x F1), and F3 populations were inoculated with isolate 127 of B. graminis in the greenhouse and evaluated for powdery mildew reaction. All parents were resistant, except for ST1-25, which had an intermediate reaction type. Genetic analyses revealed that resistance in C39 and SI5 is conferred by three dominant genes, and resistance in A55-2, R107, GO4779, OK75R3645, and Bulk PV63-6 is governed by single partially dominant genes. Data from F2, F3, and BC1 populations, derived from crosses between ‘Armada’ and Chancellor, were inconsistent but indicated that Armada has at least one dominant gene for resistance, which likely is Pm4b us previously postulated. Resistance in VPM1 and ST1-25 is governed by one recessive gene in each fine. Three to 11 different resistance genes are represented among the 10 parents.

Received for publication April 11, 1994.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the Crop Science Society of America.