Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 35:213-218 (1995)
© 1995 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chastian, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wysocki, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chastian, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wysocki, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chastian, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wysocki, D. J.

Stand Estblishment Response of Soft White Winter Wheat to Seedbed Residue and Seed Size

T. G. Chastian*, K. J. Ward and D. J. Wysocki

Dep. of Crop and Soil Science, Crop Science Building 107, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331-3002
Columbia Basin Agric. Res. Center, Oregon State Univ., Pendleton, OR 97801

* Corresponding author (chastait{at}css.orst.edu).

The adoption of soil-conserving management systems in dryland soft white winter wheat (Triticurn aestivum L.) production areas is limited by concerns that seedbed residues contribute to suboptimal stand establishment. Field trials were seeded in 1990 (Trial 1) and 1991 (Trial 2) near Pendleton, OR, to ascertain seedbed crop residue, seed size, and cultivar effects on emergence, early growth and development, and yield of soft white winter wheat. Seedbeds were much drier in Trial 2 than in Trial 1. Seed-soil contact was probably reduced in high residue cover, but emergence rate was reduced by seedbed residue in Trial 2 only when seed zone water content was <120 g kg –1. Consequently, plant growth and development were responsive to seedbed residues only in Trial 2. Final stand density and grain yield were not sensitive to seedbed residue level in either trial. Seed size had no effect on laboratory germination, but seedlings from large seed emerged more rapidly in the held. Plants grown from large seed were taller, heavier, and had more tillers than plants grown from small seed. Planting large seed had no effect on grain yield in Trial 1, but plants grown from large seed produced 4.2% greater grain yield than from small seed in Trial 2. Cultivar performance was determined by genetic potential, seed size, and seed quality, and was not differentially influenced by seedbed residue level. Emergence was influenced by coleoptile length which differed among cultivars, but coleoptile length was not related to seed size. Higher levels of seedbed surface residues required to reduce soil erosion in dryland crop production systems do not reduce stand Establishment or yield of soft white winter wheat.


Contribution of the Oregon Agric. Exp. Stn., Corvallis. Technical Paper no. 10421.

Received for publication February 22, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
P. Pedersen and J. G. Lauer
Soybean Growth and Development Response to Rotation Sequence and Tillage System
Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1005 - 1012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P. M. Carr, R. D. Horsley, and W. W. Poland
Tillage and Seeding Rate Effects on Wheat Cultivars: II. Yield Components
Crop Sci., January 1, 2003; 43(1): 210 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the Crop Science Society of America.