Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 34:367-371 (1994)
© 1994 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jefferson, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jefferson, P. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jefferson, P. G.

Genetic Variation for Epicuticular Wax Production in Altai Wildrye Populations that Differ in Glaucousness

Paul G. Jefferson*

Agriculture Canada Research Station, Box 1030, Swift Current, Saskatchewan, Canada, S9H 3X2

* Corresponding author.

Epicuticular wax (EW) is reported to be a beneficial trait for the adaptation of plants to water-limited environments. Glaucousness is associated with increased EW in other species and with a forage yield advantage in Altai wildrye [Leymus angustus (Trin.) Pilger Dewey] grown in a water-limited environment. The purpose of this research was to determine the variation for EW production, the heritability of EW production, and genetic correlation of EW production with forage yield within three populations of half-sib lines of Altai wildrye that were glaucous, nonglaucous, or variably glaucous (unselected). Leaf EW was extracted with petroleum ether and expressed as mass per unit leaf area (EW1, g m–2) or as mass per unit leaf dry weight (EW2, mg g–1). The glaucous population produced about twice as much EW as the non-glaucous and unselected populations in each of 3 yr. The variation among half-sib lines for both EW1 and EW2 within each population was significant. The distribution of the glaucous population was distinct from the other two populations in all 3 yr. Heritability estimates for EW1 were 0.36 (SE = 0.12), 0.90 (SE = 0.17), and 0.67 (SE = 0.15) for the glaucous, unselected, and nonglaucous population, respectively. Heritability estimates for EW2 were in the same range. The genetic correlations between EW production and forage yield were significant for the glaucous population (r = –l0.25* for EW1, r = –0.53** for EW2) and the nonglaucous population (r = –0.31* for EW2). While selection for increased EW production is feasible for Altai wildrye, it would result in lower forage yield in water-limited environments.

Received for publication September 23, 1992.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1994 by the Crop Science Society of America.