HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stroup, W. W. Articles by Mulitze, D. K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Stroup, W. W. Articles by Mulitze, D. K. Agricola Articles by Stroup, W. W. Articles by Mulitze, D. K.

Removing Spatial Variation from Wheat Yield Trials: A Comparison of Methods

Dep. of Biometry
Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Agronomix Software, Inc., P.O. Box 67, Portage la Prairie, MB R1N 3B2, Canada

^* Corresponding author.

Most cultivar evaluation trials use blocked designs and are analyzed using classical analysis of variance; however, a standard analysis for blocked designs often does not adequately account for spatial variability. Recent advances in spatial statistics suggest that there are better alternatives. The primary objective of this research was to compare randomized complete block (RCB) analysis with two nearest neighbor adjustment (NNA) methods; a random field procedure was also examined, as another way to remove spatial variability. Yield data from three replicated breeding nurseries involving diverse adapted and unadapted germplasm, each grown at four locations in Nebraska during 1988–1989, were used for the comparisons. The NNA approach was superior for all nurseries at all locations, on the basis of lower coefficient of variation and greater ability to distinguish cultivar differences. For 9 of 12 trials, RCB cultivar means were highly correlated with NNA cultivar means, indicating that both procedures would identify similar elite lines. For three trials, however, the estimated cultivar yield and cultivar rank from RCB and NNA procedures were different, and so different lines would be selected. The random field analysis was applied to the trial for which the discrepancy between the RCB and NNA analysis was greatest; this yielded results similar to the nearest neighbor analysis. Our results suggest that spatial trends are common in Nebraska and compromise the accuracy and precision of standard analysis of blocked designs. Therefore, NNA or random field analysis should be used to improve the analysis of breeding trials.

Received for publication August 6, 1992.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. L. Roozeboom, W. T. Schapaugh, M. R. Tuinstra, R. L. Vanderlip, and G. A. Milliken Testing Wheat in Variable Environments: Genotype, Environment, Interaction Effects, and Grouping Test Locations Crop Sci., January 16, 2008; 48(1): 317 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Baenziger, B. Beecher, R. A. Graybosch, A. M. H. Ibrahim, D. D. Baltensperger, L. A. Nelson, Y. Jin, S. N. Wegulo, J. E. Watkins, J. H. Hatchett, et al. Registration of 'NE01643' Wheat Journal of Plant Registrations, January 1, 2008; 2(1): 36 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bermudez and A. P. Mallarino Impacts of Variable-Rate Phosphorus Fertilization Based on Dense Grid Soil Sampling on Soil-Test Phosphorus and Grain Yield of Corn and Soybean Agron. J., May 11, 2007; 99(3): 822 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Baenziger, W. K. Russell, G. L. Graef, and B. T. Campbell Improving Lives: 50 Years of Crop Breeding, Genetics, and Cytology (C-1) Crop Sci., September 8, 2006; 46(5): 2230 - 2244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Casanoves, R. Macchiavelli, and M. Balzarini Error Variation in Multienvironment Peanut Trials: Within-Trial Spatial Correlation and Between-Trial Heterogeneity Crop Sci., August 26, 2005; 45(5): 1927 - 1933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. M. Ray, A. Segovia-Lerma, and L. W. Murray Diallel Analysis of Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Its Association with Forage Yield among Nine Historically Recognized Alfalfa Germplasms Crop Sci., November 1, 2004; 44(6): 1970 - 1975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.-C. Yang, T. Z. Ye, S. F. Blade, and M. Bandara Efficiency of Spatial Analyses of Field Pea Variety Trials Crop Sci., January 1, 2004; 44(1): 49 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bermudez and A. P. Mallarino Yield and Early Growth Responses to Starter Fertilizer in No-Till Corn Assessed with Precision Agriculture Technologies Agron. J., September 1, 2002; 94(5): 1024 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Mallarino, M. U. Haq, D. Wittry, and M. Bermudez Variation in Soybean Response to Early Season Foliar Fertilization among and within Fields Agron. J., November 1, 2001; 93(6): 1220 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Liu, E. A. Guertal, and E. van Santen Population Differentiation, Spatial Variation, and Sampling of Tall Fescue under Grazing Agron. J., September 1, 1999; 91(5): 801 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text]