Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 34:165-169 (1994)
© 1994 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katerji, N.
Right arrow Articles by Quetin, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Katerji, N.
Right arrow Articles by Quetin, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Katerji, N.
Right arrow Articles by Quetin, P.

Behavior of Maize Stem Diameter during Drying Cycles: Comparison of Two Methods for Detecting Water Stress

Nader Katerji, François Tardieu*, Olivier Bethenod and Philippe Quetin

INRA, Station de Bioclimatologie, F 78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
INRA, Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environmentaux, 2 place Viala, F34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France

* Corresponding author.

Changes in stem diameter are frequently used to assess plant water status. We have compared two ways of data processing, analyzing either the changes in daily stem contraction (the most commonly used method) or the changes in daily maximum stem diameter (DMSD). Changes in stem diameter of adult maize (Zea mays L.) plants were measured during drying cycles either in the field or in a pot experiment, together with predawn leaf water potential, noon-time stomatal conductance, noon-time leaf water potential, and fraction of soil transpirable water. Close relationships, common for field and pot experiments, were observed between changes in DMSD and predawn leaf water potential (r2 = 0.91), and noon-time stomatal conductance (r2 = 0.81). Relationships also existed between DMSD and the fraction of soil transpirable water (r2 = 0.84 and 0.87 in the field and pot experiments, respectively). In contrast, the daily stem contraction showed complex and loose relationships with soil and plant water status, and with stomatal conductance. This is consistent with the facts that (i) maize day-time plant water status undergoes relatively little changes during drying cycles, and (ii) stomatal conductance is linked to the soil water status, and is therefore correlated to measurements characterizing night-time plant water status such as DMSD or predawn leaf water potential. A practical consequence would be that changes in DMSD should be used rather than daily stem contraction for characterizing plant water status of maize, or for triggering the beginning of irrigation in automatic systems.

Received for publication September 28, 1992.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
K. G. Yatapanage and H. B. So
The Relationship between Leaf Water Potential and Stem Diameter in Sorghum
Agron. J., November 1, 2001; 93(6): 1341 - 1343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1994 by the Crop Science Society of America.