Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 33:924-928 (1993)
© 1993 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Koeyer, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pomeranke, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by De Koeyer, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pomeranke, G. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by De Koeyer, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pomeranke, G. J.

Effects of Recurrent Selection for Grain Yield on Oat Kernel Morphology

D. L. De Koeyer* and D. D. Stuthman

Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics

R. G. Fulcher and G. J. Pomeranke

Dep. of Food Science and Nutrition, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Agrigenetics Co., Madison, WI 53716

* Corresponding author.

Kernel size, as it is related to kernel weight, is an important yield component in oat (Avena saliva L.). The main objective of our research was to evaluate the changes in kernel morphology following five cycles of recurrent selection for grain yield. Parents of Cycles 0, 1, 3, and 5 and seven check cultivars were grown in row and hill plots at St. Paul and Rosemount, MM, in 1989. Kernel area, perimeter, length, and width were measured on 100-kernel samples from each plot using digital image analysis (DIA). Grain yield, kernel weight, and kernel number were also evaluated in these experiments. Grain yield was enhanced by 26.8 and 55.3% following five cycles of recurrent selection as measured in row and hill plots, respectively. Kernel area increased by 9.8 and 10.1% in row and hill plot samples, respectively. Kernel perimeter, length, and width increased by 4.8, 5.7, and 4.6%, respectively, in row plot samples. In hill plot samples, kernel perimeter, length, and width increased by 5.5, 6.8, and 3.7%, respectively. There were no significant difference among cycles for two derived shape factors, FCIRCLE (4 {pi} [kernel area]/[kernel perimeter]2) and kernel width/length ratio. Values for kernel area, perimeter, length, and width from hill plot samples were significantly larger than those from row plots; however, selection responses in the two plot types were quite similar. In this study, environmental influences on kernel morphology were minor. Kernel weight was positively correlated with the two size measurements, kernel area and width. Results from our study indirectly suggest that increased kernel size, and not kernel density, largely accounts for the observed increases in kernel weight. These experiments also demonstrate the utility of DIA in agronomic research.


Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal no. 20,037. The Financial support of the Quaker Oats Co. is gratefully acknowledged.

Received for publication August 31, 1992.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. E. Diaz-Lago, D. D. Stuthman, and T. E. Abadie
Recurrent Selection for Partial Resistance to Crown Rust in Oat
Crop Sci., September 1, 2002; 42(5): 1475 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. J. Wiersma, R. H. Busch, G. G. Fulcher, and G. A. Hareland
Recurrent Selection for Kernel Weight in Spring Wheat
Crop Sci., July 1, 2001; 41(4): 999 - 1005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1993 by the Crop Science Society of America.