Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 33:740-744 (1993)
© 1993 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tahir, M.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tahir, M.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tahir, M.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, M.

Assessment of Screening Techniques for Heat Tolerance in Wheat

M. Tahir* and M. Singh

Intl Center for Agric. Res. in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), P.O. Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria

* Corresponding author.

Heat causes considerable damage to the wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.) plant. The present method of assessing heat tolerance in wheat, which is based on cell membrane thermostability, is not efficient for screening large numbers of genotypes. This study compares the efficiencies of two modified methods with that of the original method for measuring heat damage in wheat genotypes. Percent heat damage was analyzed by an errors-in-variables approach. Measurements of the original method were regressed on measurements of the new methods. The first modified method, is 25% more efficient than the original method and possesses similar accuracy. In the second method, the slope differed from unity by 3% and the intercept was –3.21, but the ranks of the tested genotypes did not change. Therefore, for screening heat-tolerant genotypes relative to a check, the second method, which is 50% more efficient than the original method, is recommended because the relative classification of genotypes into tolerant and susceptible groups does not change with a constant difference in the measurements.

Received for publication July 27, 1992.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1993 by the Crop Science Society of America.