HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vaillancourt, R. E. Articles by Barnard, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Vaillancourt, R. E. Articles by Barnard, J. Agricola Articles by Vaillancourt, R. E. Articles by Barnard, J.

Isozyme Diversity in the Cowpea Species Complex

Co-op Res. Ctr. for Temperate Hardwood Forestry, Univ. of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Norman F. Weeden and John Barnard

Dep. of Hortic. Sci., New York State Agric. Exp. Stn., Cornell Univ., Geneva, NY, USA 14456

^* Corresponding author.

The cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] is an important crop in many countries of tropical Africa, Asia and South America. Compared with other leguminous crops, little is known about the population structure of the cowpea and the partitioning of genetic diversity between cultivated and wild cowpea. One hundred and twelve accessions of cultivated cowpea (V. unguiculata ssp. unguiculata) and 43 of wild cowpea (V. unguiculata ssp. dekindtiana) were evaluated for genetic diversity at 26 isozyme loci. Cultivated accessions were characterized by very low genetic diversity (Ht = 0.029), with only six polymorphic loci. Four of these polymorphic loci displayed one very common allele and one rare allele. Accessions possessing these rare alleles were dispersed throughout Africa and a geographical center of isozyme diversity was not evident. Cultivated groups biflora (the catjang) and sesquipedalis (the yard-long bean) could not be differentiated from the cowpea. Wild cowpea, on the other hand, were highly diverse (Ht = 0.168), with 19 out of 26 loci polymorphic. Our data indicate introgression from wild to cultivated must be very rare. Six wild accessions displayed high identity with the cultivated cowpea. Wild cowpea may, therefore, be the progenitor of the cultivated cowpea. Because these wild accessions were dispersed throughout equatorial Africa, there is no isozyme evidence for a narrowly defined center of domestication.

Received for publication March 6, 1992.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C.-D. Li, C. A. Fatokun, B. Ubi, B. B. Singh, and G. J. Scoles Determining Genetic Similarities and Relationships among Cowpea Breeding Lines and Cultivars by Microsatellite Markers Crop Sci., January 1, 2001; 41(1): 189 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]