Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 33:482-485 (1993)
© 1993 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andrade, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Frugone, M. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Andrade, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Frugone, M. I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Andrade, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Frugone, M. I.

Intercepted Radiation at Flowering and Kernel Number in Maize: Shade versus Plant Density Effects

Fernando H. Andrade*, Sergio A. Uhart and Mariano I. Frugone

Unidad integrada INTA Estaciön Exp. Agropecuaria Balcarce-Facultad de Ciencies Agrarias, Univ. Nacional de Mar del Plata, C.C. 276 (7620) Balcarce, Bs. As., Argentina

* Corresponding author.

The number of grains produced in maize (Zea mays L.) is altered by environmental conditions during growth. The response occurs primarily during flowering. The objective of this work was to study the relationship between intercepted radiation during a 31-d period bracketing flowering and final kernel number per unit area in maize and to analyze the effect of plant density on that relationship. Shading and population density experiments were conducted at Balcarce, Argentina, under no limitations of water and nutrients. A significant and positive association between number of kernels per square meter and intercepted radiation during this 31 d was found for the shading experiments. The slope of this relationship was 5.39 kernels MJ–1 of intercepted radiation. When intercepted radiation at flowering was modified by varying plant density within suboptimal values, the response of number of kernels per unit area was larger than that observed in the shading experiments (28 vs. 5.39 kernels MJ–1; P ≤ 0.001). At supraoptimal densities, the number of kernels per unit area was significantly reduced even though the amount of radiation intercepted by the crop was not affected. This work indicates that a model developed from shading experiments and based on the amount of radiation intercepted by the crop at flowering does not predict the effect of altered plant density on kernel number. Suboptimal and supraoptimal densities produced a strong negative effect on the efficiency with which the crop or plant converts intercepted radiation into grain sink capacity.


This work was supported by Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (INTA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Técnicas (CONICET), and DeKalb Argentina SA.

Received for publication November 12, 1991.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. I. Lizaso, A. E. Fonseca, and M. E. Westgate
Simulating Source-Limited and Sink-Limited Kernel Set with CERES-Maize
Crop Sci., September 1, 2007; 47(5): 2078 - 2088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
G. A. Maddonni, A. G. Cirilo, and M. E. Otegui
Row Width and Maize Grain Yield
Agron. J., October 3, 2006; 98(6): 1532 - 1543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. M. Hashemi, S. J. Herbert, and D. H. Putnam
Yield Response of Corn to Crowding Stress
Agron. J., May 13, 2005; 97(3): 839 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. E. Fonseca, J. I. Lizaso, M. E. Westgate, L. Grass, and D. L. Dornbos Jr.
Simulating Potential Kernel Production in Maize Hybrid Seed Fields
Crop Sci., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1696 - 1709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. I. Lizaso, M. E. Westgate, W. D. Batchelor, and A. Fonseca
Predicting Potential Kernel Set in Maize from Simple Flowering Characteristics
Crop Sci., May 1, 2003; 43(3): 892 - 903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. T. Ritchie and G. Alagarswamy
Model Concepts to Express Genetic Differences in Maize Yield Components
Agron. J., January 1, 2003; 95(1): 4 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
Y. Hebert, E. Guingo, and O. Loudet
The Response of Root/Shoot Partitioning and Root Morphology to Light Reduction in Maize Genotypes
Crop Sci., March 1, 2001; 41(2): 363 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
F. H. Andrade, M. E. Otegui, and C. Vega
Intercepted Radiation at Flowering and Kernel Number in Maize
Agron. J., January 1, 2000; 92(1): 92 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1993 by the Crop Science Society of America.