HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Glinski, D. S. Articles by Carrow, R. N. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Glinski, D. S. Articles by Carrow, R. N. Agricola Articles by Glinski, D. S. Articles by Carrow, R. N.

Comparison of Reporting Methods for Root Growth Data from Transparent-Interface Measurements

Agronomy Dep., Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602

Robert N. Carrow^*

Agron. Dep., Univ. of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223-1797

^* Corresponding author.

Transparent viewing planes provide a useful and popular means of observing and quantifying root growth. This study was conducted to compare root growth quantification by soil depth and distribution using three tracing methods of reporting root growth: (i) traced root intensity (traced RI), (ii) traced root-length density (traced RLD), and (iii) traced root-length area (traced RLA). These three root-tracing methods were compared with actual RLD and actual RLA determinations made from the bulk soil volume at the termination of the study. Creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.; syn A. palustris Huds.) sod was planted in clear, flexible polyethylene containers slanted at a 20° angle. During a period of 2 mo, root growth by depth was monitored by tracing roots onto clear polyester sheets. None of the reporting methods for traced roots generated root growth measurements equivalent to actual rooting. Traced RLD yielded the best estimates of root quantity at each soil depth, yet, generated poor root distribution estimates. Traced RLA yielded the most accurate estimate of root distribution compared with actual root distribution when data were transformed to a percent basis. Flexible, transparent polyethylene containers used for viewing-plane measurements of root growth quantification and distribution can, when reported by these three methods, differ substantially from actual bulk soil RLD or RLA. Thus, this transparent viewing-plane procedure exhibits the same problems inherent in root measurements from rhizotrons and minirhizotrons.

Received for publication September 5, 1991.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. V. Vaughan, J. W. MacAdam, S. E. Smith, and L. M. Dudley Root Growth and Yield of Differing Alfalfa Rooting Populations under Increasing Salinity and Zero Leaching Crop Sci., November 1, 2002; 42(6): 2064 - 2071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Fagerness and F. H. Yelverton Plant Growth Regulator and Mowing Height Effects on Seasonal Root Growth of Penncross Creeping Bentgrass Crop Sci., November 1, 2001; 41(6): 1901 - 1905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]