Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 33:258-263 (1993)
© 1993 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nedel, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pan, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nedel, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pan, W. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nedel, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pan, W. L.

Barley Semidwarf and Standard Isotype Yield and Malting Quality Response to Nitrogen

Jorge L. Nedel, Steven E. Ullrich*, Janet A. Clancy and William L. Pan

Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, College of Agric. and Home Econ., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164

* Corresponding author.

Introduction of certain semidwarf genes into wheat (Triticum spp.) has improved N-use efficiency, particularly at high N supply. This study was conducted to determine whether yield and grain quality differ between standard height (STD) and mutant semidwarf (SD) malting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) isotypes with varying levels of N supply. Isotype pairs (‘Morex’, ‘Hazen’, ‘Norbert’, and ‘Andre’) and check cultivars (Steptoe, Klages) were grown with 30, 60, 90, and 120 kg N ha–1 in 1987 and 1989. Yield, grain characteristics, and malting quality parameters were evaluated. The STD isotypes had higher yield (6781 vs. 5642 and 5202 vs. 4504 kg ha–1 in 1987 and 1989, respectively) and generally higher values for yield components and harvest index, as well as better grain quality than their respective SD isotypes; however, two-row SD isotypes had better malting quality than their STD isotypes. The generally superior performance of STD isotypes in part may be due to the SD isotypes being raw induced mutants that had not been improved by crossing. Malting quality parameters, such as total malt protein and malt extract, were affected negatively by N >60 kg ha–1, when the preceding crop was pea (Pisum sativum L.; high N); however, for yield and some malt quality parameters such as diastatic power, all genotypes responded significantly and positively to N fertilization when the preceding crop was barley (low N). In general, the response to N was similar for both barley types. As SD malting barley cultivars are developed to control lodging, they may not utilize more N or yield more than STD types.


Support provided by state and federal funds under Project no. 1006 and Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (EMBRAPA), Brazil. Dep. Paper no. 9101-22.

Received for publication March 20, 1992.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1993 by the Crop Science Society of America.