Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 32:1402-1408 (1992)
© 1992 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dever, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gannaway, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dever, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gannaway, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dever, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gannaway, J. R.

Relative Fiber Uniformity between Parent and F1 and F2 Generations in Cotton

Jane K. Dever and John R. Gannaway*

Texas A&M Univ. Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Rt. 3, Box 219, Lubbock, Texas 79401

* Corresponding author.

Hybrids (F2) of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) reportedly offer improved seedling vigor, disease tolerance, and yield for this major crop of the Texas High Plains but raise concern about increased fiber property variability. Our objective was to compare fiber variability in the F2 generation with that in pure lines and in F1 hybrid cultivars. A four-parent complete diallel mating system using lines with similar and divergent fiber types resulted in 28 treatments: 4 parents, 12 F1 hybrids, and 12 F2 hybrids. The variance (converted to base 10 logarithm) of 10 plants in each treatment was analyzed by a randomized block design analysis of variance with three blocks. Subsets of the treatments (parents, F1's , and F2's) and orthogonal contrasts (parents vs. F1 and F2, F1 vs. F2; parents and F1 vs. F2, wide F1 vs. wide F2 [fineness]; wide F1 vs. narrow F1, wide F2 vs. narrow F2 [fineness]; wide F1 vs. narrow F1, wide F2 vs. narrow F2 [length/strength]) were analyzed. When environmental influence is high, strength and standard fineness show more variability in the F2 than in the F1 hybrid. The higher variability for strength and standard fineness disappears when environmental influence is minimal; the variability that does occur, both in the F1 hybrid and in the F2 hybrid, appears to be a function of original parental variability, especially for fiber fineness or agronomic properties. When original parental variability was low and the strength and standard fineness of the two parents were similar, fiber variability in the F2 hybrid was not greater than variability on a single plant in any generation.


This work was supported by a grant from the American Cyanamid Co.

Received for publication March 18, 1991.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
B. Wang, Y. Wu, W. Guo, X. Zhu, N. Huang, and T. Zhang
QTL Analysis and Epistasis Effects Dissection of Fiber Qualities in an Elite Cotton Hybrid Grown in Second Generation
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1384 - 1392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1992 by the Crop Science Society of America.