HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Grimes, D. W. Articles by Sheesley, W. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Grimes, D. W. Articles by Sheesley, W. R. Agricola Articles by Grimes, D. W. Articles by Sheesley, W. R.

Alfalfa Yield and Plant Water Relations with Variable Irrigation

Land, Air, and Water Resources Dep., Univ. of California, Davis, and Kearney Agric. Ctr., 9240 S. Riverbend Ave., Parlier, CA 93648
Univ. of California Kearney Agric. Ctr.
County Extension, Fresno, CA

^* Corresponding author.

In the arid and semiarid western USA, alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) grown for forage requires large amounts of water for high productivity. Managing alfalfa to achieve the best possible water-use efficiency (WUE) is essential for the crop to remain competitive for water supplies both within and outside agriculture. This study was conducted in the San Joaquin Valley of California, to define alfalfa forage yield and plant water relation responses of three alfalfa cultivars (CUF 101, Moapa 69, and WL 318) to contrasting irrigation intensities and establish critical plant water-status values for irrigation scheduling. A single line-source sprinkler system provided a variable water supply. The soil was a Hanford sandy loam, silty substratum (coarse-loamy, mixed, nonacid, thermic typic xerorthent). Maximum total season crop evapotranspiration (ET_c) of 1000 mm gave 26.3 Mg ha^–1 of hay yield that was similar for the three cultivars. A linear hay yield (Y_h)–ET_c relationship was defined as Y_h = –0.212 + 0.0265ET_c (r² = 0.82). Water-use efficiency, 23.1 Mg ha^–1 dry matter per meter of water used as ET_c, was comparable with other C₃ species. As midday plant water potential (_w) declined below –1 MPa, yield reductions were observed for all cultivars. Increased crop water stress index (CWSI) was correlated (r = 0.84) with declining _w below the –1 MPa yield-limiting _w threshold. Absolute values of _w or CWSI associated with a given yield reduction were cultivar-dependent; Moapa 69 and WL 318 responded alike, but each differed from CUF 101. Plant-based water-status measurements provided a practical and reliable index for assessing the adequacy of supplied irrigation water.

Received for publication September 23, 1991.