Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 32:1127-1131 (1992)
© 1992 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gouesnard, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gallais, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gouesnard, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gallais, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gouesnard, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gallais, A.

Genetic Variance Component Estimation in a Nested Mating Design with Positive Assortative Mating, and Application to Maize

Brigitte Gouesnard* and André Gallais

INRA, Station de Génétique et dAmélioration des Plantes de Montpellier, Domaine de Melgueil, 34130 Mauguio, France
INRA-UPS, Station de Génétique Végétale, Ferme du Moulon, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France, and I.N.A.P.G., 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France

* Corresponding author.

Negative estimation of genetic variance components can arise in a nested mating design. This may be due to inaccurate estimates, experimental problems, sampling error, or failure of the assumptions of the genetic or statistical models. We examined the effect of assortative mating on male and female variance components ({sigma}2M and {sigma}2F, respectively) in a nested mating design. Two correlation coefficients were introduced to quantify the effect of assortative mating: the correlation coefficient between females mated to the same male (r) and the correlation coefficient between male and female (r'). Under positive assortative mating, additive variance is systematically overestimated and dominance variance is underestimated. If there is a correlation among females mated to a male but no correlation between male and female (r' = 0, r != 0), the additive variance is overestimated by 4 r {sigma}2F and nonadditive variance is underestimated by 8 r {sigma}2F. To investigate the presence of assortative mating in a nested design, expressions of correlations among parents were given as a function of the estimated components of variance and of the type of gene action. Correlations among parents were estimated utilizing experimental data for various traits in maize (Zea mays L.) from which negative estimates of dominance had been obtained. Estimates of r were positive and high for earliness traits indicating assortative mating relative to earliness, which may in part explain negative dominance variance estimates. However, correcting variance components estimates is difficult when genetic variation of the trait is not strictly additive.

Received for publication June 17, 1991.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1992 by the Crop Science Society of America.