HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cherney, J. H. Articles by Volenec, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cherney, J. H. Articles by Volenec, J. J. Agricola Articles by Cherney, J. H. Articles by Volenec, J. J.

Forage Evaluation as Influenced by Environmental Replication: A Review

Dep. of Soil, Crop, & Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853
Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907

^* Corresponding author.

Environment and treatment x environment interactions affect forage research results. This problem becomes even more complicated with forage crops that are biennial or perennial and are harvested several times each growing season. Our objective was to examine the role of environmental replication in forage experiments. A survey of forage researchers was used to determine prevailing opinions on the subject. Many traits are evaluated in forage crops, from biomass yield to basic physiological traits, and environmental impact varies among the traits. Some traits are unaffected by environment or treatment x environment interactions, although evidence must be provided when using this assumption in designing and reporting a study. The hypothesis being tested and the desired range in inferences helps determine the number of environmental regimes. A study must be repeatable (within its range of inferences) such that similar conclusions would reached if the experiment were repeated. We can extend inferences beyond the environments included in the experiment if a historic data base can show the stability of the response across environments. Consider the complex interaction between environment, plant response, and nutritive value of the forage when setting up forage-quality studies. Multiple harvests in a year can rarely be considered an acceptable form of environmental replication. Although we do not specify number of locations and years for forage experiments, single environments must be properly justified, especially for forage-quality experiments. If a single environment cannot be justified, then at least two environments are needed. Authors and journal editorial boards should share the responsibility for maintaining scientific quality in forage research.

Received for publication August 28, 1991.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Sanderson Upland Switchgrass Yield, Nutritive Value, and Soil Carbon Changes Under Grazing and Clipping Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 510 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Holman, C. Hunt, and D. Thill Structural Composition, Growth Stage, and Cultivar Affects on Kentucky Bluegrass Forage Yield and Nutrient Composition Agron. J., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 195 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]