Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 32:677-680 (1992)
© 1992 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bacon, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by King, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bacon, R. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by King, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bacon, R. K.

Vernalization Requirement of Winter and Spring Oat Genotypes

Stephen R. King and Robert K. Bacon*

Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701

* Corresponding author.

Unfavorable weather conditions often make it desirable to plant oat (Avena sativa L.) in the spring in areas where winter oat cultivars are usually planted. Information regarding vernalization requirements is needed to determine whether winter or spring oat cultivars should be planted. Twenty-five winter and five spring oat genotypes were evaluated for responsiveness to vernalization. Germinated seeds were vernalized at 5 1/4 and a 12-h photoperiod for 0,12,24, or 48 d. Seedlings were transplanted to a greenhouse with an 18-h photoperiod and temperature of 21 1/4 day/18 1/4 night. All winter oat genotypes responded to cold treatment with a decrease in days to heading, whereas none of the spring oat cultivars responded to vernalization for days to heading. Although there was variability among three plantings of the experiment, 24 d of vernalization was sufficient to fully vernalize all winter genotypes. The length of time required for panicle emergence for the winter oat genotypes was reduced by the 24-d cold treatment an average of 19 d compared with the nonvernalized controls. The cultivars Dubois and Madison were the most responsive to vernalization, showing an average decrease of 52 and 45 d to heading, respectively, after 24 d of cold treatment in three experiments. Vernalization reduced plant height in many of the winter oat genotypes. Dubois and Madison were the only genotypes that consistently increased in plant height in response to vernalization. There were no differences in any of the measured variables between the 48- and 24-d treatments. Results indicate that either spring or winter oat can be planted in the spring in the winter oat area if the winter oat has a short, facultative vernalization requirement.


Published with permission of the director of the Arkansas Agric. Exp. Stn.

Received for publication March 12, 1991.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. M. Baloch, R. S. Karow, E. Marx, J. G. Kling, and M. D. Witt
Vernalization Studies with Pacific Northwest Wheat
Agron. J., September 1, 2003; 95(5): 1201 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1992 by the Crop Science Society of America.