Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 32:490-492 (1992)
© 1992 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernardo, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bernardo, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bernardo, R.

Weighted vs. Unweighted Mean Performance of Varieties across Environments

Rex Bernardo*

Limagrain Genetics, 737 Co. Rd. 1200 N. Champaign, IL 61821.

* Corresponding author.

If within-environment error and variety x environment interaction variances are heterogeneous across environments, weighted means may provide more precise estimates of varietal mean performance than the arithmetic (unweighted) mean. The objective of this study was to compare the arithmetic mean (YA) and two types of weighted means (YR and YE) as estimators of varietal performance. Weights were inversely proportional to Shukla's residual variance estimates in YR and to withinenvironment error mean squares in YE. Fifty-threenvironments used in a corn (Zea mays L.) yield trial were repeatedly partitioned into model data and validation data. Compared with YR and YE, YA had slightly higher correlations with validation data means. Least significant differences of YA were 2 and 11% smaller than those of YR and YE, respectively. The failure of YR to be superior over YA was attributed to sampling error in the estimates of residual variances. The continued use of the arithmetic mean in estimating average varietal performance is suggested, even if error and variety x environment interaction variances are heterogeneous.

Received for publication May 24, 1991.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. W. Edwards and J.-L. Jannink
Bayesian Modeling of Heterogeneous Error and Genotype x Environment Interaction Variances
Crop Sci., February 24, 2006; 46(2): 820 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the Crop Science Society of America.