HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dofing, S. M. Articles by Knight, C. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dofing, S. M. Articles by Knight, C. W. Agricola Articles by Dofing, S. M. Articles by Knight, C. W.

Alternative Model for Path Analysis of Small-Grain Yield

Agric. and Forestry Exp. Stn., Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks, 533 E. Fireweed, Palmer, AK 99645.

^* Corresponding author.

The model most widely used for path analysis of grain yield in small grains assumes bidirectional causal pathways between yield components; however, because yield components develop sequentially, it is questionable from a biological standpoint whether a yield component could influence others that develop earlier. The purpose of this research is to describe the theory and application of an alternative model for path analysis of grain yield that takes into account the sequential development of yield components. Path analysis was performed assuming bidirectional and unidirectional causal relationships among yield components of eight spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars grown at Palmer and Fairbanks, AK, in each of two years. Yield and the yield components spikes per square meter, kernels per spike, and kernel weight were estimated. The unidirectional model seems to reflect operative causal pathways more realisitically, and results in simpler estimates that present a clearer picture of the relationships among grain yield and yield components. Of the three yield components, spikes per square meter resulted in the greatest positive contribution to yield, while the effect of kernels per spike on kernel weight was the most negative compensatory response among yield components.

Received for publication May 20, 1991.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. K. Berg, S. M. Cunningham, S. M. Brouder, B. C. Joern, K. D. Johnson, J. B. Santini, and J. J. Volenec The Long-Term Impact of Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilization on Alfalfa Yield and Yield Components Crop Sci., September 1, 2007; 47(5): 2198 - 2209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Dhungana, K. M. Eskridge, P. S. Baenziger, B. T. Campbell, K. S. Gill, and I. Dweikat Analysis of Genotype-by-Environment Interaction in Wheat Using a Structural Equation Model and Chromosome Substitution Lines Crop Sci., March 1, 2007; 47(2): 477 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. R. Guillen-Portal, R. N. Stougaard, Q. Xue, and K. M. Eskridge Compensatory Mechanisms Associated with the Effect of Spring Wheat Seed Size on Wild Oat Competition Crop Sci., February 24, 2006; 46(2): 935 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Maman, S. C. Mason, D. J. Lyon, and P. Dhungana Yield Components of Pearl Millet and Grain Sorghum across Environments in the Central Great Plains Crop Sci., November 1, 2004; 44(6): 2138 - 2145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. F. G. del Moral, Y. Rharrabti, D. Villegas, and C. Royo Evaluation of Grain Yield and Its Components in Durum Wheat under Mediterranean Conditions: An Ontogenic Approach Agron. J., March 1, 2003; 95(2): 266 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]