Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 32:19-23 (1992)
© 1992 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCaig, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by DePauw, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McCaig, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by DePauw, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McCaig, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by DePauw, R. M.

Breeding for Preharvest Sprouting Tolerance in White-Seed-Coat Spring Wheat

T. N. McCaig* and R. M. DePauw

Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Box 1030, Swift Current, Saskatchewan, Canada, S9H 3X2

* Corresponding author.

White seed-coat is a desirable quality attribute for many uses of wheat (Triticum spp.). Unfortunately white seed coat has traditionally been associated with low tolerance to preharvest sprouting. The objective was to assess our breeding progress to improve the preharvest sprouting tolerance of white genotypes. In 1987 and 1988, two groups of white genotypes, developed in our breeding program, were compared with 20 genotypes differing in seed-coat color (red or white), preharvest sprouting tolerance, and class of wheat. Three categories of tests were used to evaluate sprouting tolerance: (i) artificial rain (AR) treatment of intact heads, (ii) germination (G) of hand threshed heads, and (iii) field weathering (FW). The AR and G tests differentiated and ranked genotypes in agreement with previous information, while the FW test proved unsatisfactory, probably due to insufficient rainfall during the field weathering periods. The white genotypes developed from two tolerant parents (2TP) displayed higher levels of tolerance than those developed from a single tolerant parent (1TP). Only tolerant red genotypes and registered hard red spring cultivars had more tolerance than the 2TP group. The 2TP group was judged to be equal in tolerance to ‘Laura’, a hard red spring wheat with a reasonable level of sprouting tolerance, and better than eight groups comprised of 19 genotypes. The results suggest that white-seed-coat cultivars can be developed with high levels of preharvest sprouting tolerance. Observed differences between wheat classes probably reflect current cultivars and applied selection pressure, either direct or indirect during cultivar development, rather than inherent differences between classes.

Received for publication October 9, 1990.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Imtiaz, F. C. Ogbonnaya, J. Oman, and M. van Ginkel
Characterization of Quantitative Trait Loci Controlling Genetic Variation for Preharvest Sprouting in Synthetic Backcross-Derived Wheat Lines
Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1725 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1992 by the Crop Science Society of America.