HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hintz, R. W. Articles by Albrecht, K. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hintz, R. W. Articles by Albrecht, K. A. Agricola Articles by Hintz, R. W. Articles by Albrecht, K. A.

Prediction of Alfalfa Chemical Composition from Maturity and Plant Morphology

Dep. of Agronomy, Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Ctr., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Dep. of Agronomy Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.

^* Corresponding author.

To make informed harvest management decisions, producers need information on the chemical composition of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) forage. Our objective was to develop a fast and simple method for predicting forage chemical composition (crude protein, neutraland acid-detergent fiber, and acid-detergent lignin) using morohological characters. Five alfalfa cultivars werevaluated across a range of environments, growth cycles, and harvest maturities. The 15 morphological characters examined for association with chemical composition included number of nodes per plant, plant height, mean stage count (MSC), mean stage weight (MSW), and alternative stage of development descriptions. Simple regression analyses based on node number and plant height provided better prediction equations than when based on MSC or MSW. Multiple regression equations based on two and three morphological characters provided higher R2 and lower root mean squarerror (RMSE) values than did linear and quadratic models based on a single morphological character. Multiple regression of the two most easily measured characters, height of the tallest stem (MAXHT) and maturity stage the most mature stem (MAX), provided equations with RMSE values only slightly greater than those of the best two-factor multiple regression models based on characters that are more difficult to measure. Thus, multiple regression techniques should improve the accuracy of predicting forage chemical composition, and the use of easily determined characteristicsuch as MAXHT and MAX may provide the best compromise between prediction accuracy and ease of use.

Received for publication December 10, 1990.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. F. S. Lamb, H.-J. G. Jung, C. C. Sheaffer, and D. A. Samac Alfalfa Leaf Protein and Stem Cell Wall Polysaccharide Yields under Hay and Biomass Management Systems Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1407 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Malinowski, W. E. Pinchak, B. A. Kramp, H. Zuo, and T. J. Butler Supplemental Irrigation and Fall Dormancy Effects on Alfalfa Productivity in a Semiarid, Subtropical Climate with a Bimodal Precipitation Pattern Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 621 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Parsons, J. H. Cherney, and H. G. Gauch Jr. Alfalfa Fiber Estimation in Mixed Stands and Its Relationship to Plant Morphology Crop Sci., October 2, 2006; 46(6): 2446 - 2452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Parsons, J. H. Cherney, and H. G. Gauch Estimation of Preharvest Fiber Content of Mixed Alfalfa-Grass Stands in New York Agron. J., June 27, 2006; 98(4): 1081 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Hall, W.S. Smiles, and R. A. Dickerson Morphological Development of Alfalfa Cultivars Selected for Higher Quality Agron. J., November 1, 2000; 92(6): 1077 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text]