Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 31:1464-1467 (1991)
© 1991 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vivar, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vivar, H. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vivar, H. E.

Field Resistance to Russian Wheat Aphid in Barley: I. Sympton Expression

D. S. Calhoun*

Dep. of Agronomy 104 Sturgiss Hall, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803-2110

P. A. Burnett, J. Robinson and H. E. Vivar

CIMMYT, Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico D. F., Mexico

* Corresponding author.

Russian wheat aphid (RWA), Diuraphis noxia (Mordvilko), is a serious pest of wheat (Triticum aestim L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). This research was conducted to identify barley genotypes resistant to RWA under field conditions. Spring barley genotypes were evaluated during summer 1989 (109 genotypes) and winter 1990 (111 genotypes) at El Batán, Mexico. Hill-plots of 8 to 10 seeds were infested with 90 to 110 greenhouse-reared RWA per hill. Hills were visually rated on a 1 to 6 scale (1 no symptoms) for RWA damage at tillering (Zadoks 10 to 29), jointing (Zadoks 30 to 35), and post-heading (Zadoks 59 to 65). Genotypes differed significantly (P < 0.01) in reaction to RWA at individual scoring dates, and averaged over all scoring dates. Fifteen genotypes were classified as resistant (score < 2.51) based on overall mean score; seven of these were resistant at all scoring dates. The latter included selections from the crosses SMA1/SB401, API/CM67//ACER,ASE/2CM//B.7.6.B.B, GLORIA/COME, CI1255/ARAMIR//GLORIA/3/CI2325/CI12225//BOY*2/3*SURB,ECT/6/M/N//V/4/USB//13914/C/3/SMA/5/SMA, and SD729/POR/3/APM/ATHS//GVA/4/ORE.Significant (P < 0.01) genotype x crop cycle and genotype x growth stage interactions suggest the possibility of improving detection of material with useful levels of resistance by screening in the environment where the material will ultimately be grown, and observing plants at various stages during crop growth. Despite the complication of interaction effects, field screening using artificially infested hill-plots was effective in identifying barley genotypes that expressed RWA resistance across a broad range of growing conditions and crop development.


Research supported through core funds of CIMMYT.

Received for publication October 24, 1990.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. W. Mornhinweg, M. J. Brewer, and D. R. Porter
Effect of Russian Wheat Aphid on Yield and Yield Components of Field Grown Susceptible and Resistant Spring Barley
Crop Sci., December 2, 2005; 46(1): 36 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1991 by the Crop Science Society of America.