Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 31:1427-1431 (1991)
© 1991 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ekiz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Konzak, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ekiz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Konzak, C. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ekiz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Konzak, C. F.

Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Control of Anther Culture Response in Wheat: II. Common Wheat x Alloplasmic Lines

Hasan Ekiz and C. F. Konzak*

Bhari Dagdas Int. Winter Cereals Res. Ctr., P. Box: 325, Konya, Turkey
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences and Program in Genetics and Cell Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6420.

* Corresponding author.

This study was conducted to evaluate the roles of nuclear and cytoplasmic gene control of anther culture responses in wheat, Triticum aestivum L. Two groups of reciprocal crosses were used; One, between alloplasmic lines of T. aestivum L. cultivars Selkirk, Siete Cerros 66, and Penjamo 62 and other T. aestivum cultivars; and the other, between several alloplasmic lines and their nucleus-donor cultivars. Anther donor plants were grown in a greenhouse. Anthers were placed on liquid potato-4 medium for callus induction, and calli were transferred to agar solidified 190-2 media for plant regeneration. Significant reciprocal differences were observed in both groups for all components of anther culture response. Most differences were for callus induction. Reciprocal differences were considered due to cytoplasmic effects rather than maternal effects based on earlier studies. Reciprocal differences observed for one cross of an alloplasmic line and its nuclear donor source indicated that selection of nuclear genes favoring compatibility with the alien cytoplasm had occurred during the backcross process by which the alloplasmic lines were developed. However, in two combinations, heterosis due to nuclear genetic interactions was observed. The results provide substantial supporting evidence for cytoplasm and cytoplasm x nuclear genetic controls of the response of wheat genotypes to anther culture.


College of Agric. and Home Economics Res. Ctr. Paper no. 9001-18, Projects no. 1568 and 3571. Research supported in part by the Ministry of Agric., Forestry, and Rural Affairs of Turkey, and by the Washington Agric. Res. Ctr. and Washington Wheat Commission.

Received for publication September 24, 1990.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1991 by the Crop Science Society of America.