Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 31:588-593 (1991)
© 1991 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Wynne, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Wynne, J. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Wynne, J. C.

Heritability and Early-Generation Selection for Resistance to Early and Late Leafspot in Peanut

W. F. Anderson*, C. C. Holbrook and J. C. Wynne

Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7629
USDA-ARS, Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., Tifton, GA 31794-0748

* Corresponding author.

The genetic nature of resistance to early (Cercospora arachidicola Hod) and late [Cercosporidium personatum (Berk. & Curt.) Deighton] leafspot of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is quantitative, making selection for resistance difficult in segregating populations. In many areas of peanut production, without fungicide application one or both diseases may significantly reduce yields. A study was conducted to obtain heritability estimates, responses to selection, and relationship of resistance of two peanut populations for early and late leafspot resistance. Selection based on F2 family means in the F3 generation via defoliation, infection, and sporulation was performed for early and late leafspot in North Carolina and Georgia, respectively, within populations of PI 314817/[TG3/EC 76446 (292)] and (PI 314817/ICGS 4). Divergent selections for each disease were evaluated in the F4 generation at the same locations the following year for resistance by visual rating of infection and defoliation. Broad-sense heritability estimates ranged from low to high (0.12–0.88) for components of resistance to each leaf-spot disease. Narrow-sense heritability estimates from parent-offspring regression (0.18–0.74) and realized heritability (0.60–1.41) were significant for late leafspot resistance and early leafspot resistance in the PI 314817/[TG3/EC 76446 (292)] population. Results indicated that selection based family means would be successful. Selection of individual plants within families did not significantly improve genetic progress. Moderate to high correlations (0.41–0.86) existed between early and late leafspot disease components indicating possible genetic linkage or host-plant physiology that conferred resistance to both diseases in one population.


North Carolina Agric. Res. Ser. Paper no. 12571. The investigation was partially supported by the Peanut Collaborative Research Support Program, U.S. Agency for Int. Development grant No. DAN-4048-G-SS-2065-00. Recommendations do not represent an official position or policy of USAID or USDA.

Received for publication March 1, 1990.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1991 by the Crop Science Society of America.