Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 31:363-366 (1991)
© 1991 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chu, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chu, C. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chu, C. C.

Reduction in Insecticide Use Associated with Cotton Resistant to Pink Bollworm

F. Douglas Wilson*, Hollis M. Flint, Louis A. Bariola and Chang Chi Chu

* Corresponding author.

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growers use significant quantities of insecticides to control pink bollworm (PBW), Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders). The germplasm line WC-12NL (nectariless, okra leaf, and early maturing) and ‘Deltapine 61’ (nectaried, normal leaf, and later maturing) were grown at Maricopa, AZ, and Brawley, CA, for three seasons. Irrigation water was terminated and plots were defoliated earlier than normal, a practice that favored the early maturing line. Insecticides were applied as needed, based on PBW egg infestations of cotton bolls. The major objective was to determine whether insecticide use can be reduced or eliminated by growing WC-12NL. Other objectives were to compare WC-12NL with Deltapine 61 for PBW resistance, yield, earliness, and fiber properties; to study location and seasonal effects; and to determine whether the growth-regulating chemical ethephon (2-chloroethylphosphonic acid) would cause bolls to open earlier. The mean number of insecticide applications was 41% lower for WC-12NL than for Deltapine 61. First and last application dates averaged 21 d later and 10 d earlier, respectively, for WC-12NL. WC-12NL had significantly less seed damage caused by PBW, yielded significantly more lint, was significantly earlier, but had inferior fiber properties compared with Deltapine 61. Ethephon treatment increased earliness of Deltapine 61 but did not affect that of WC-12NL, probably because it was applied too late. Location and seasonal effects and numerous interactions occurred, but did not alter the main conclusion that a cotton line such as WC-12NL (but with improved fiber properties) could be valuable in areas where PBW is a problem.


USDA-ARS in cooperation with the Arizona Agric. Exp. Stn., Western Cotton Res. Lab., 4135 E. Broadway Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85040.

Received for publication November 6, 1989.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1991 by the Crop Science Society of America.