Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 30:1259-1264 (1990)
© 1990 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wullschleger, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Oosterhuis, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wullschleger, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Oosterhuis, D. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wullschleger, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Oosterhuis, D. M.

Photosynthetic Carbon Production and Use by Developing Cotton Leaves and Bolls

S. D. Wullschleger* and D. M. Oosterhuis

Environmental Sciences Div., Oak Ridge Natl. Lab., Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Dep. of Agronomy, Altheimer Lab., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701

* Corresponding author.

Understanding the photosynthetic C contribution of leaves to vegetative and reproductive processes is important in defining yield productivity. However, the morphological complexity of the cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) canopy has proven a significant barrier to establishing specific yield relationships. Therefore, a 2-yr study examined the developmental sequences of C production and utilization by leaves and bolls within the crop canopy. Photosynthesis of sympodial leaves reached a maximum just prior to anthesis of the subtended flower and thereafter declined throughout the boll-filling period. Carbon budgets for individual sympodial leaves and their subtended bolls at mainstem Nodes 8, 10, and 12 indicated that C production was seldom synchronized with C utilization. Carbon import requirements for the first three fruiting positions at mainstem Node 10 were 50,37, and 21%, respectively. Bolls at mainstem Node 8 collectively required >60% import of C to sustain growth during the season. Only at mainstem Node 12 were leaves capable of supplying the total C needs of their subtended bolls. Carbon deficiencies at mainstem Nodes 8 and 10 suggested that substantial translocation of photosynthate from adjacent leaves and leaves outside the mainstem node was necessary. This was confirmed through short-term studies of l4C-assimilate movement from leaves to developing cotton bolls. Breeding goals for improved C production by leaves were simulated to evaluate avenues for increased yields through crop genetics. These simulations indicated an advantage of increased leaf longevity in the maintenance of C production.


Published with the approval of the Director, Arkansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Fayetteville, AR

Received for publication January 22, 1990.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. Wells
Stem and Root Carbohydrate Dynamics of Two Cotton Cultivars Bred Fifty Years Apart
Agron. J., July 1, 2002; 94(4): 876 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
E.M. Holman and D.M. Oosterhuis
Cotton Photosynthesis and Carbon Partitioning in Response to Floral Bud Loss Due to Insect Damage
Crop Sci., September 1, 1999; 39(5): 1347 - 1351.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1990 by the Crop Science Society of America.