Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 30:1210-1215 (1990)
© 1990 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Louie, R.
Right arrow Articles by Findley, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Louie, R.
Right arrow Articles by Findley, W. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Louie, R.
Right arrow Articles by Findley, W. R.

Elite Maize Germplasm: Reactions to Maize Dwarf Mosaic and Maize Chlorotic Dwarf Viruses

R. Louie*, J. K. Knoke and W. R. Findley

USDA-ARS and Dep. of Plant Pathology
USDA-ARS and Dep. of Entomology
USDA-ARS and Dep. of Agronomy, Ohio State Univ., Ohio Agric. Res. and Development Ctr., Wooster, OH 44691

* Corresponding author.

Information developed on the reactions of elite maize germplasm to maize dwarf mosaic (MDMV) and maize chlorotic dwarf (MCDV) viruses should aid breeding for resistance to these pathogens. The reactions of 23 dent maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds (plus one synthetic) and 46 hybrids were evaluated in the field and greenhouse following artificial inoculation with MCDV and two strains (A and B) of MDMV. Infection, as determined by diagnostic symptoms, was higher in greenhouse than in field tests. Furthermore, most of the apparent resistance to MDMV-A in the field was not confirmed when inoculations were made on younger, more succulent plants in the greenhouse. Inbreds B68, OhlEP, Pall, Pa405, and the synthetic, OhS2, were immune or highly resistant to MDMVA and -B. Inbred B64 was only resistant to MDMV-B. No inbred was immune to MCDV, but Ga209, Oh7B, Pall, Tx601, and Oh1EP had the lowest disease incidence in the field, whereas Pall and B68 were the most resistant in the greenhouse. Most of the 32 field-planted hybrids that were resistant to MDMV-A had A632, A634, B64 or B68 as one parent; for MDMV-B, only B64 or B68 germplasm conveyed effective resistance. Hybrids B64xB68 and B68xB64 were immune to MDMV-A and -B in both field and greenhouse tests. The best and poorest hybrid reactions to MCDV in the field were B68xMol7 and A632xB73, respectively. The most resistant hybrid (Mol7xB64) in the greenhouse had =50% infected plants. Plant height and yield losses in inbreds and hybrids to MDMV were minimal, whereas MCDV usually caused significant height (34% average) and yield reductions (72% average). The reactions of these elite sources of germplasm to MDMV and MCDV suggest that evaluations for virus resistance in maize should include both field and greenhouse test environments.


Cooperative investigation between the USDA-ARS and OSU-OARDC, Wooster, OH 44691. Approved for publication as Journal Article no. 199-89 of OSU-OARDC.

Received for publication August 7, 1989.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1990 by the Crop Science Society of America.