|
|
||||||||
Univ of Hohenheim, D-7000 Stuttgart 70, West Germany
Dep. of Agronomy
Cereal and Soybean Unit, USDA-ARS, and Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
* Corresponding author.
Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) have been proposed for investigating relationships among inbred lines and predicting heterosis and performance of single-cross hybrids in maize (Zea mays L.). Such use was evaluated in 20 maize inbreds classified as first-cycle, second-cycle, good, and poor lines, and in diallel crosses within types. Eight generations (parents, F1, F2, F3, backcrosses, and backcrosses selfed) from 67 crosses were evaluated for grain yield in five Iowa environments. Genetic effects were estimated from generation means by ordinary diallel analyses and the Eberhart-Gardner genetic model. Poor inbreds showed significantly greater average heterosis than did good lines. Estimates of additive x additive epistatic effects were negative and highly significant in all except first-cycle lines. Using two restriction enzymes and 82 genomic) DNA probes distributed throughout the maize genome, all but one probe revealed polymorphisms with at least one enzyme (~4.5 variants per RFLP locus). Genetic distances between lines within types were estimated as Rogers' distances (RD). Within diallel sets, RD values were partitioned into general (GRD)and specific (SRD). All four types of lines showed similar means and substantial variation for RD; GRD explained ~40% of the variation among RD values. Cluster analyses revealed associations among lines generally consistent with expectations based on known pedigrees. Correlations of RD and SRD with F1 yield heterosis, specific heterosis, and specific combining ability were positive but small (r =
0.50) when combined for all crosses. Results indicated that RFLPs can be used to investigate pedigree relationships among maize inbreds, but also suggest that RFLP-based genetic distance measures are of limited use in predicting heterotic performance of single crosses between unrelated lines.
Received for publication January 2, 1990.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. A. Lee, M. J. Ash, and B. Good Re-examining the Relationship between Degree of Relatedness, Genetic Effects, and Heterosis in Maize Crop Sci., March 1, 2007; 47(2): 629 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Phillips Genetic Tools from Nature and the Nature of Genetic Tools Crop Sci., September 8, 2006; 46(5): 2245 - 2252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Casler, M. Diaby, and C. Stendal Heterosis and Inbreeding Depression for Forage Yield and Fiber Concentration in Smooth Bromegrass Crop Sci., January 1, 2005; 45(1): 44 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Udall, P. A. Quijada, H. Polewicz, R. Vogelzang, and T. C. Osborn Phenotypic Effects of Introgressing Chinese Winter and Resynthesized Brassica napus L. Germplasm into Hybrid Spring Canola Crop Sci., November 1, 2004; 44(6): 1990 - 1996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Betran, J. M. Ribaut, D. Beck, and D. G. de Leon Genetic Diversity, Specific Combining Ability, and Heterosis in Tropical Maize under Stress and Nonstress Environments Crop Sci., May 1, 2003; 43(3): 797 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. A. Gutierrez, S. Basu, S. Saha, J. N. Jenkins, D. B. Shoemaker, C. L. Cheatham, and J. C. McCarty Jr. Genetic Distance among Selected Cotton Genotypes and Its Relationship with F2 Performance Crop Sci., November 1, 2002; 42(6): 1841 - 1847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Stuber, M. Polacco, and M.L. Senior Synergy of Empirical Breeding, Marker-Assisted Selection, and Genomics to Increase Crop Yield Potential Crop Sci., November 1, 1999; 39(6): 1571 - 1583. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||