Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 30:809-814 (1990)
© 1990 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Porath, A.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, D. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Porath, A.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, D. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Porath, A.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, D. N.

Taproot Restriction Effects on Growth, Earliness, and Dry Weight Partitioning of Cotton

A. Ben-Porath and D. N. Baker*

Plant Physiology Lab., MIGAL Galilee Techn. Ctr., Kiryat Shmona 10200, Israel
USDA-ARS, Crop Simulation Res. Unit, Mississipi State, MS 39762

* Corresponding author.

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is an indeterminate, woody perennial, whose primary axis remains vegetative throughout the life of the plant. During the boll-filling period, the growing mainstem and taproot compete with reproductive organs for limited supplies of assimilates. In a series of experiments, the effects of taproot restrictions on growth and development of drip irrigated cotton plants were explored. Cotton (‘Stoneville 825’) plants were grown outdoors and in sunlit growth chambers. Taproots were restricted to various degrees by using different pot sizes (I, 2.5, 7, 12, and 18 L) during the years 1982 to 1983. The pots were arranged in a row crop configuration (10 plants m–1 of row, 1m between rows). Dry matter distribution was measured destructively. The restriction of the taproot apical dominance by small pots (I or 2.5 L) accelerated the formation of secondary and tertiary roots compared to roots in larger pots (7 L or more). Taproot-restricted plants started to flower earlier and they flowered faster. Their heavier load of developing bolls caused a greater slowing of vegetative growth of the main axis. As a result, taproot-restricted plants were more compact due to shorter internodes on fruiting branches and at the top of the plant. Taprootrestricted plants were earlier and higher yielding in short seasons because of better partitioning of assimilates into fruit rather than into storage organs.


Contribution from USDA-ARS, Crop Science Res. Lab., Crop Simulation Res. Unit and Mississippi State Univ., Dep. of Agronomy. This work was supported, in part, by BARD Grant no. US-236-8

Received for publication May 17, 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
C. W. Kennedy and R. L. Hutchinson
Cotton Growth and Development under Different Tillage Systems
Crop Sci., July 1, 2001; 41(4): 1162 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1990 by the Crop Science Society of America.